Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Purnimasi Bhuyan – Appellant
Versus
Sukhada Das – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and petitioner’s claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dismissal of injunction application by lower courts. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court’s supervisory jurisdiction under article 227. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final order and directive for trial court. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
A.C. Behera, J.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner (appellant in F.A.O. No.31 of 2023 and petitioner in I.A. No.417/518 of 2022 arising out of C.S. No.1630/1971 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Balasore) against the O.P. No.1 (respondent in FAO No.31 of 2023, O.P. in I.A. No.417/518 of 2022, defendant No.4 in the suit vide C.S. No.1630/1971 of 2022) praying for quashing/setting aside the impugned judgment dated 27.07.2023 (Annexure-5) passed in F.A.O. No.31 of 2023 by the learned District Judge, Balasore.
2. The factual backgrounds of this CMP, which prompted the petitioner for filing of the same is that, the petitioner being the plaintiff filed the suit vide C.S. No.1630/1971 of 2022 in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balasore praying for partition of
Jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot be invoked to correct subordinate court errors unless manifest injustices occur; findings on temporary injunction based on ownership records must be respected pe....
The principle that a prior sale takes precedence over a subsequent sale is affirmed, emphasizing the High Court's limited scope of interference under Article 227.
The court upheld that an injunction is not grantable when a petitioner has an equally efficacious remedy available in prior ongoing litigation concerning the same subject matter, emphasizing respect ....
In partition suits, all co-owners retain interest in joint properties until a formal partition is established, necessitating expedient resolution of such suits.
Ambiguous status quo orders are unsustainable; courts must specify the status to be preserved to avoid legal uncertainties.
A court must issue reasoned orders for all applications, even after a case is disposed of, rejecting motions based solely on functus officio is contrary to natural justice.
The court established that the High Court's supervisory powers under Article 227 do not extend to correcting mere errors of law or fact, and that the rights claimed under an unprobated Will must be a....
The principle of res judicata does not apply when a previous suit is dismissed on technical grounds, allowing for a new suit to be filed based on a recurring cause of action for partition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
