Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
MAA ANAPURNA SHG CUTTACK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.C. BEHERA, J.
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner Self Help Group(SHG) along with another against the Opposite Parties praying for quashing (setting aside) the assignment of Operation and Management of Sishu Bhawan Aahar Kendra to the Opposite Party No.5 (Hasnabada SHG, Cuttack) and to issue the Expression of Interest(EOI) in favour of the petitioner SHG for Operation and Management of Sishu Bhawan Aahar Kendra as per the advertisement dated 14.10.2025 on the basis of the highest marks secured by the petitioner cancelling the assignment of Opposite Party No.5 SHG.
2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the petitioner SHG for filing of the same is that, the Assistant Commissioner-cum-SIO, Cuttack Municipal Corporation, CMC (Opposite Party No.4) published an advertisement inviting the applications of the SHGs for the selection of one SHG among them for the Operation and Management of Sishu Bhawan Aahar Kendra for the financial year 2025-2026 stating in the Expression of Interest No. 1465 (Annexure-3) that, the interested applicant SHGs should submit their applications
Participation in a selection process estops unsuccessful candidates from contesting the selection outcome, and the selection committee's decision is final and binding.
A participant in a selection process cannot challenge the outcome based on criteria accepted prior to participation, emphasizing the binding nature of selection committee findings.
Participation in a public selection process constitutes acceptance of the terms, barring subsequent challenges to the outcome based on alleged irregularities.
The court reinforced that compliance with procedural directives is mandatory in selection processes, emphasizing the principles of natural justice and fair hearing.
The cancellation of a selection process must be based on valid reasons and cannot be arbitrary; failure to provide such reasons renders the cancellation unlawful.
Engagement of Self Help Groups for supply of Take Home Ration is governed by administrative guidelines, and lack of renewal does not constitute an enforceable right, nor does it require a prior notic....
Authority must comply with the principles of natural justice by providing an opportunity to be heard before making adverse decisions affecting rights previously established.
The administrative engagement of Women's Self Help Groups in public procurement is policy-driven; no legal entitlement exists to continuous participation without performance assessments.
Exclusion from administrative decisions must comply with natural justice, ensuring the affected party is given a fair chance to respond before adverse actions are taken.
The exclusion of a party from procurement proceedings without a fair opportunity to be heard violates principles of natural justice, and any prior rights must be respected.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
