Chandramani Samal vs Sukanti Samal - 2026 Supreme(Ori) 589

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Ori) 589

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Chandramani Samal – Appellant
Versus
Sukanti Samal – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. P.C. Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondents:Mr. Prabin Dash, Advocate On behalf of Mr. S.K. Dash, Adv.

Table of Content
1. plaintiff's ownership and claims regarding suit properties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. defendants challenge plaintiff's claims and argue rights. (Para 6)
3. court resolved issues in favor of plaintiff. (Para 7 , 9)
4. assessing legal status of plaintiff's property ownership. (Para 13 , 16 , 17)
5. court's determination on eviction of defendants. (Para 18 , 19)
6. final dismissal of the appeal. (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

A.C. Behera, J.

This Second Appeal has been preferred against the confirming judgment.

2. The Appellants in this Second Appeal being the husband and wife respectively were the Defendant Nos.1 and 2 before the learned Trial Court in the suit vide C.S. No.20 of 2019 and Appellants before the learned 1^st Appellate Court in the first appeal.

The Respondent No.1 in this 2nd Appeal was the sole Plaintiff before the learned Trial Court in the suit vide C.S. No.20 of 2019 and Respondent No.1 before the learned 1^st Appellate Court in the 1^st appeal vide R.F.A. No.16 of 2023.

The Respondent Nos.2 to 5 in this 2^nd Appeal were the Defendant Nos.3 to 6 before the learned Trial Court in the suit vide C.S. No.20 of 2019 and Respondent Nos.2 to 5 before the learned 1^st Appellate