IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Anirudha Kuanr – Appellant
Versus
Natabar Sethi – Respondent
Judgment :
A.C. Behera, J.
This Second Appeal has been preferred against the confirming judgment.
2 . The appellants of this Second Appeal were the plaintiffs before the Trial Court in the suit, vide T.S. No.172 of 1988-I and they were the appellants before the First Appellate Court in the First Appeal vide T.A. No.112 of 1994.
The respondents of this Second Appeal were the defendants before the Trial Court in the suit, vide T.S. No.172 of 1988-I and they were the respondents before the First Appellate Court in the First Appeal vide T.A. No.112 of 1994.
3 . The suit of the plaintiffs (appellants in this Second Appeal) vide T.S. No.172 of 1988-I before the Trial Court was a suit for declaration and permanent injunction.
4 . As per the averments made by the plaintiffs in their plaint, the suit properties were originally under the Zamidari Estate of the ex-landlord (zamidar) Bira Kishore Das. In the year 1938, the said Bira Kishore Das inducted the father of the plaintiffs i.e. Biswanath Kuanr and his brother Sripati Kuanr as the tenants of the suit properties. Accordingly, on the basis of the induction made by the ex-intermediary Bira Kishore Das to the father of the plaintiffs and his bro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.