SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 682

ORISSA HIGH COURT
JITENDRA KUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. allegations of fraud and misappropriation. (Para 3 , 4 , 6)
2. petitioners claim informant liable for commercial dispute. (Para 7 , 8)
3. arguments for and against bail and nature of dispute. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. investigation and transaction details. (Para 13 , 14)
5. court's position on grounds for bail. (Para 15)
6. caution regarding civil vs. criminal distinctions. (Para 16)
7. court's order granting anticipatory bail. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

R.K. PATTANAIK, J.

1. Heard Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Panda, learned ASC for the State and Mr. Nayak, learned counsel for the informant.

2. Instant petition under Section 481 BNSS is at the behest of the petitioners seeking grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Lalbag P.S. Case No.229 dated 17th November, 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.679 of 2024 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M.(S), Cuttack on the grounds stated.

3. The informant lodged a complaint in 1.C.C. No.1148 of 2024 in the Court of learned S.D.J.M.(S), Cuttack alleging therein that the petitioners committed fraud and cheated him to the tune of Rs.2,04,32,000/- (rupees two crores four lakh thirty- two thousand) wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top