SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 709

ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
Ananda Chandra Behera, J.
Maa Tarini SHG, Bonth represented through its Secretary - Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha & Others - Opposite Parties
WP(C) No.2068 of 2026
Decided On : 30-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.K. Dalei, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel.

Exclusion from government procurement processes without providing a fair hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating reconsideration of such administrative decisions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ of Mandamus - The petitioner, a Women's Self Help Group, challenged the Office Order excluding its name from the list of paddy procurement agencies for Kharif Marketing Season 2025-26, arguing that the exclusion was arbitrary and lacked due process as no opportunity to be heard was provided (Paras 2, 6, 10).

(B) Natural Justice - The court emphasized that before any administrative decision affecting rights is made, a party must be heard, underscoring the importance of procedural fairness (Paras 6, 11).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was initially selected as a paddy procurement agency, conducted necessary training, received equipment, and was included in the final list, only to be excluded without notice or a hearing the following day (Paras 2, 5, 10).

Findings of Court:
The court found merit in the writ petition and quashed the Office Order, directing the Collector to reconsider the exclusion while ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice (Paras 9, 11).

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was given a fair hearing before being excluded from the procurement list, and the grounds for the exclusion cited by the authorities (Paras 4, 10).

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the lack of opportunity to be heard before the exclusion renders the Office Order unsustainable, reinforcing the necessity of adhering to procedural safeguards in administrative action (Paras 7, 11).

Result: The writ petition is allowed, and the impugned Office Order is quashed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks quashing of exclusion from procurement list. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court disposes of the petition with directives. (Para 3 , 9 , 12)
3. legal rights were created, and a hearing was required. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. court allowed the writ petition, quashed exclusion. (Para 8 , 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner- Maa Tarini-WSHG praying for quashing the Office Order dated 03.01.2026 under Annexure-8 issued by the Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4) relating to the exclusion of the name of the petitioner-WSHG from the Annexure-7 as a society/agency for the procurement of paddy of Kharif Marketing Season 2025-26 of Bonth Block and to declare the action of the Opp. Parties relating to the exclusion of the name of the petitioner for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025- 26 of Bonth Block as arbitrary and illegal and issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Opp. Parties to allow the petitioner- WSHG to procure Paddy for KMS 2025-2026 of Bonth Block in accordance with the notified policy along with other reliefs, to which, the petitioner-WSHG is entitled for.

2. The case of the petitioner-WSHG is that, as per the decision of the District Level Paddy Procurement Committee (DLPC) for KMS 2025-26, the petitioner-WSHG was selected as a paddy procurement society/agency of Bonth Block reflecting the name of the petitioner-WSHG as such, in Serial No.85 of Annexure-3 indicating its PAC Code No.S2040422. Thereafter, as per Office Order dated 11.12.2025 issued by the Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4), a training programme was conducted and in such training programme, the members of the petitioner-WSHG successfully completed their training and demonstrated their preparedness to procure paddy in compliances with the policy frameworks. Thereafter, on dated 15.12.2025, the authorities distributed paddy procurement equipments to all the selected WSHGs including the petitioner-WSHG, to which, the petitioner-WSHG received with proper acknowledgments.

The above conduct of the Opp. Parties is clearly clarifying that, petitioner-WSHG was fully equipped in its all respect for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26 of Bonth Block. Nodal Officer was also duly appointed for the smooth progress of the paddy procurement system by the petitioner-WSHG and the final list of eligible Women Self Help Groups including the petitioner-WSHG for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025- 26 of Bonth Block was prepared on dated 02.01.2026 as per Annexure-7, in which, the name of the petitioner-WSHG was in Sl. No.33, but on its next day, i.e. on 03.01.2026, suddenly, the same Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4) unilaterally and illegally issued the impugned Office Order vide Annexure- 8 excluding the name of the petitioner-WSHG as an agency for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26 behind the back of the petitioner without giving any opportunity of being heard to the petitioner-WSHG for the exclusion of its name from the paddy procurement system for KMS 2025-26 and illegally tagged to the registered farmers of the petitioner with Opp. Party No.6-WSHG for the paddy procurement for KMS 2025-26 of Bonth Block.

For which, without, getting any way, the petitioner-WSHG filed this writ petition against the Opp. Parties praying for quashing the impugned Letter/Order dated 03.01.2026 vide Annexure-8 issued/passed by the Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.4) relating to the exclusion of the name of the petitioner-WSHG as an agency for the procurement of paddy for Kharif Marketing Season 2025-26 of Bonth Block and to declare the action of the Opp. Parties as arbitrary and illegal and to issue a Writ of Mandamus against the Opp. Parties directing the Opp. Parties to allow the petitioner-WSHG to procure the paddy for KMS 2025-2026 of Bonth Block in accordance with the notified policy.

3. I have already heard from the learned counsel fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top