ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
Ananda Chandra Behera, J.
Maa Subhadra Self Help Group, Bahabalpur & Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Odisha & Others - Opposite Parties
WP(C) No.2470 of 2026
Decided On : 30-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for paddy procurement eligibility. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. need for adherence to procedural fairness. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. undisputed documents supporting petitioner's selection. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's directive for fresh consideration and justification. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final disposition of the writ petition. (Para 9 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing the Office Order dated 13.01.2026 under Annexure-7 issued by the Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.3) relating to the exclusion of the name of the petitioner- SHG from the Annexure-6 as a society/agency for the procurement of paddy of Kharif Marketing Season 2025-26 of Tihidi Block and to declare the action of the Opp. Parties relating to the exclusion of the name of the petitioner for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26 of Tihidi Block as arbitrary and illegal and issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Opp. Parties to allow the petitioner-WSHG to procure Paddy for KMS 2025-2026 of Tihidi Block in accordance with the notified policy along with other reliefs, to which, the petitioner-SHG is entitled for.
2. The case of the petitioner-SHG is that, as per the decision of the District Level Paddy Procurement Committee (DLPC) for KMS 2025-26, the petitioner-WSHG was selected as a paddy procurement society/agency of Tihidi Block reflecting the name of the petitioner-SHG as such, in Serial No.15 of Annexure-3 indicating its PPC Code No.S2040709. Thereafter, as per Office Order dated 18.12.2025 issued by the Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.3), a training programme was conducted and in such training programme, the members of the petitioner-SHG successfully completed their training and demonstrated their preparedness to procure paddy in compliances with the policy frameworks. Thereafter, on dated 15.12.2025, the authorities distributed paddy procurement equipments to all the selected WSHGs including the petitioner-SHG, to which, the petitioner-SHG received with proper acknowledgments.
The above conduct of the Opp. Parties is clearly clarifying that, petitioner-SHG was fully equipped in its all respect for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26 of Tihidi Block. Nodal Officer was also duly appointed for the smooth progress of the paddy procurement system by the petitioner-SHG and the final list of eligible Self Help Groups including the petitioner-SHG for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26 of Tihidi Block was prepared on dated 01.01.2026 as per Annexure-6, but on, i.e. on 13.01.2026, suddenly, the same Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.3) unilaterally and illegally issued the impugned Office Order vide Annexure-7 excluding the name of the petitioner-WSHG as an agency for the procurement of paddy for KMS 2025-26 behind the back of the petitioner without giving any opportunity of being heard to the petitioner-SHG for the exclusion of its name from the paddy procurement system for KMS 2025-26 and illegally tagged to the registered farmers of the petitioner with Bamanbindha PACS for the paddy procurement for KMS 2025-26 of Tihidi Block.
For which, without, getting any way, the petitioner-SHG filed this writ petition against the Opp. Parties praying for quashing the impugned Letter/Order dated 13.01.2026 vide Annexure-7 issued/passed by the Collector, Bhadrak (Opp. Party No.3) relating to the exclusion of the name of the petitioner-SHG as an agency for the procurement of paddy for Kharif Marketing Season 2025-26 of Tihidi Block and to declare the action of the Opp. Parties as arbitrary and illegal and to issue a Writ of Mandamus against the Opp. Parties directing the Opp. Parties to allow the petitioner-WSHG to procure the paddy for KMS 2025-2026 of Tihidi Block in accordance with the notified policy.
3. I have already heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner & the learned Standing Counsel for the Stat
The exclusion of a party from a procurement list without a hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating reconsideration of such decisions.
Administrative decisions affecting rights must observe principles of natural justice, including providing an opportunity to be heard.
Exclusion from a procurement list without a hearing or reason violates principles of natural justice, rendering the action arbitrary.
Exclusion of a party from a procurement process without a hearing violates principles of natural justice and renders the action illegal.
Exclusion from administrative benefits without a hearing violates principles of natural justice and is deemed arbitrary, especially when rights have been established.
Exclusion from government procurement processes without providing a fair hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating reconsideration of such administrative decisions.
Administrative decisions affecting rights must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring an opportunity for the affected party to be heard before exclusion or adverse action.
Exclusion from administrative decisions must comply with natural justice, ensuring the affected party is given a fair chance to respond before adverse actions are taken.
The exclusion of a party from procurement proceedings without a fair opportunity to be heard violates principles of natural justice, and any prior rights must be respected.
Authority must comply with the principles of natural justice by providing an opportunity to be heard before making adverse decisions affecting rights previously established.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.