SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 714

ORISSA HIGH COURT
DEBASIS MALLICK – Appellant
Versus
SUJATA ANJALI MALLICK – Respondent


Table of Content
1. virtual appearance permission (Para 1 , 17)
2. order recall and procedure for notice (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. disposal process for ex-parte judgment (Para 11 , 14)
4. competence of family court post transfer order (Para 12 , 13)
5. disposition of the interim application (Para 19 , 20 , 21)

ORDER :

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, J.

I.A. No.23292 of 2025

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Though this is a disposed of writ petition, this I.A. has been filed by the Opposite Party-Wife to recall the order dated 26.11.2025 and direct the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack to act in terms of order dated 03.03.2021 passed by this Court in TRP(C) No.8 of 2020 and to send the record in C.P. No.660 of 2019, along with CMA No.65 of 2021, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Rourkela.

3. An objection has been filed by the Writ Petitioner to the said I.A. detailing therein the reasons to oppose such prayer made in the I.A.

4. A stand has been taken in the said Objection that neither the Writ Petitioner was noticed in TRP(C) No.8 of 2020 nor he has appeared in the said case as has been recorded in the said order dated 03.03.2021 passed in TRP(C) No.8 of 2020 and he had no know

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top