Ankura Charana Sahoo vs Sarat Chandra Majhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Ori) 740

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Ankura Charana Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Sarat Chandra Majhi – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. A. Moharana, Advocate

Table of Content
1. factual background of property ownership and issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. plaintiff's claims and defendant's position. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 12)
3. court's reasoning on necessary parties and jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 11 , 15 , 18 , 20 , 24)
4. proposition on invalid sale due to absence of permissions. (Para 19 , 22)
5. dismissal of 2nd appeal due to lack of merit. (Para 27)

JUDGMENT :

A.C. BEHERA, J.

This 2^nd appeal has been preferred against the reversing judgment.

2. The appellant in this 2^nd appeal was the sole plaintiff before the leaned trial court in the suit vide C.S. No.259 of 2014-I and respondent no.1 before the learned 1^st appellate court in the 1^st appeal vide R.F.A. No.30 of 2019.

3. The respondents in this 2^nd appeal were the defendants before the learned trial court in the suit vide C.S. No.259 of 2014-I and the appellant along with respondent nos.2 and 3 before the learned 1^st appellate court in the 1^st appeal vide R.F.A. No.30 of 2019.

The suit of the plaintiff(appellant in this 2^nd appeal) against the defendants(respondents in this 2^nd appeal) vide C.S. No.259 of 2014-I was a suit for declaration and permanent injunction.

4. The suit properties are M.S. Khat