Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Kamala Pujari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the notice for no confidence motion (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's objections to notice and procedure (Para 3) |
| 3. opposition's defense on procedure followed (Para 4) |
| 4. court's examination of statutory compliance (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's emphasis on service and statutory safeguards (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. conclusion on writ petition's merit and dismissal (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.
1. The petitioner in the present Writ Petition challenges the notice dated 25.09.2025 issued under Section 24(2)(c) and (d) of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, in the absence of any prescribed Rules, and the consequential decision of the Sub-Collector, Nabarangpur fixing 14.10.2025 at 11.00 A.M. for holding the no confidence meeting in the Gram Panchayat Office, Dahana.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:
2. Succinctly put, the facts of the case are as follows:
(i) Pursuant to the election held in the year 2022 for the office of Sarpanch of Dahana Gram Panchayat in the district of Nabarangapur, the petitioner was elected by the mandate of the public by securing a majority over the contesting candidates and has since been discharging her dut
The court confirmed that the notice for a No Confidence Motion must comply with statutory requirements; however, procedural safeguards do not invalidate proceedings if legislative intent is met.
Procedural compliance under Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act is mandatory; deviations may invalidate proceedings. The court confirmed that the notice for No Confidence Motion adhered to st....
Compliance with procedural safeguards under Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act is crucial, but minor deviations that do not demonstrate prejudice may not invalidate no-confidence proceedings....
Procedural safeguards under Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act are mandatory for no-confidence motions; late notice receipt does not invalidate proceedings absent demonstrable prejudice.
The court ruled that compliance with procedural safeguards under the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 is critical for no-confidence motions, affirming that minor deviations do not invalidate democrati....
Fifteen days notice for a no confidence motion is mandatory under Section 24(2)(c), but mode of service is directory; lack of prejudice can validate proceedings even if procedural irregularities exis....
Statutory requirements for No Confidence Motion must be strictly adhered to, including the notice being accompanied by copies of requisition and resolution, as established under the Odisha Grama Panc....
Compliance with procedural laws in no-confidence motions under the Odisha Grama Panchayats Act is essential, though timing of notice receipt versus issuance holds significance in evaluating valid par....
The court affirmed that substantive compliance with the procedural requirements of the Odisha Grama Panchayats Act, overshadowing minor technical lapses, upholds the validity of no-confidence motions....
The issuance of a notice for a no confidence motion must comply with statutory requirements, including accompanying resolutions; failure to show prejudice does not invalidate the process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
