K.KANNAN
Sh. Kamal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
K.Kannan, J.
1. All the petitioners are deputationists at the office of District Rural Development Authority (DRDA) Mewat, who had earlier held permanent employment at the office of DRDA, Gurgaon. The transfer on deputation from Gurgaon to Mewat took place at the time when a new district was created in the State of Haryana, which was earlier a part of the Gurgaon District, The office order, which was issued on 07.06.2005 by the Additional Deputy Commissioner. cum-Chief Executive Officer read that the temporary transfers of the petitioners were made for the proper functioning of office in the newly created Mewat District. The orders of transfer specifically stated that the respective staff will be treated as on deputation to DRDA, Mewat but they shall not be entitled to any deputation allowance. By subsequent memorandum issued by the Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary that the person working in DRDA, Mewat would continue until further orders.
2. The grievance of the petitioners was from amongst persons on deputation when orders were made cancelling the deputation of some persons on 28.03.2006 when the 8th petitioner was ordered to be transferred to DRDA Mewat in th
Satya Narain Pareek V/s. State Of Rajasthan And Another.
State Of Punjab And Others V/s. Inder Singh And Others.
Bihar State Water Development Corporation V/s. Arun Kumar Mishra
Block Development Officers Assn And Others V/s. State Of M.P.
Gupta And Another V/s. Union Of India
Orissa Electrical Engineers Service Association V/s. State Of Orissa And Others.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.