A.N.GROVER
Hindustan Electric Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner – Respondent
A.N.Grover, J.
1. This judgment will also dispose of the other two connected petitions (Civil Writs Nos. 1067 and 1069 of 1957) as common points of law are involved. The facts in Civil Writ No. 1068 of 1957 may be shortly stated.
2. The Government of India started a general engineering workshop at Faridabad in which according to the petitioner-company ordinary stoves meant for domestic use were being manufactured. The Government decided to dispose of the factory and invited tenders for its sale. The tender of the petitioner-company was accepted and an agreement was entered into on 17-2-1955 by virtue of which the company purchased the factory for Rs. 3,56,045/8/-.
It is alleged that after the purchase of the factory ihe company utilised the engineering workshop for the manufacture of parts required for installing a motor factory up to June 1950. By means of a letter dated 31-7-1956 the company was informed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner that the factory in question fell within the purview of the Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952.
The company was required to deposit the dues on account of contribution and administrative charges in respect of such employees who
Robindra Textile Mills V/s. Secretary, Ministry Of Labour, Govt. Of India, New Delhi
Express Newspaper Ltd. V/s. Union Of India
Ram Krishna Dalmia V/s. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
Great Eastern Electroplaters Ltd. V/s. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, U.P.
Kathi. Raning Rawat V/s. State Of Saurashtra
Nagpur Glass Works Ltd., Nagpur V/s. Regional Provident Fund commissioner, Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.