PREM CHAND JAIN, S.S.KANG
Barkat Singh – Appellant
Versus
Hans Raj Pandit, Driver – Respondent
SUKHDEV SINGH KANG, J.
1. In this revision petition filed on behalf of claimants the following two questions have been referred for decision by a Division Bench :-
(a) Whether Motor Accident Claims Tribunal while deciding claim applications filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, is a Civil Court, subordinate to the High Court for the purpose of Sec.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure? and
(b) Whether the orders passed by a Tribunal in those proceedings are amenable to the revisional jurisdiction of the High Court?
The facts leading to this reference lie in a short compass and may be stated thus :
2 Barkat Singh and others (claimants) filed a claim application before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter called the Claims Tribunal). During the pendency of those proceedings, they moved an application for impleading Pal Singh as a respondent to the claim application. The Claims Tribunal dismissed the application. The claimants filed a revision petition under Sec.115, Civil P.C. (the Code for short) in this Court. During the hearing of the revision petition, a preliminary objection was raised by the counsel for the respondents that the revision petition was not competent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.