SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(P&H) 24

TEK CHAND
Goodyear India Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal – Respondent


Judgment

Tek Chand, J.

1. This is a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari and mandamus calling for records of the industrial tribunal, Haryana (respondent 1), and quashing its order, dated 30 September 1967 (annexure Q ). Petitioner 1 is Goodyear (India), Ltd. , Ballabgarh, and petitioner 2 is Harry date Hollinger, personnel manager, Goodyear (India), Ltd, The respondents are the industrial tribunal, Haryana, Khushinder Singh and Goodyear Employees Union, Ballabgarh.

2. The facts giving rise to this petition are that respondent 2, Khushinder Singh, is the president of the Goodyear Employees Union, respondent 3, and as such he is a " protected " workman under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . He is also a workman with the designation of cureman in department 51-2. On 31 March 1967, the management of the company declared a 4 per cent bonus for the year 1966 under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. Respondent 2 called a meeting of the workers of the company on 31 March 1987, at 8-35 a. m. and another on 1 April 1967, at 10 a m. It is said that he instigated the workmen to slow

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top