SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 1366

A.S.GARG
Hari Singh Nalwa – Appellant
Versus
Kartar Singh Bhadana – Respondent


Judgment

1. The general elections to the Haryana Assembly were scheduled to be held in January/February, 2000. The petitioner Sri Hari Singh Nalwa, claimed that he was a Congress nominee for Assembly Election relating to 18-Smalkha Assembly Constituency, District Panipat. Respondent No. 1 Shri Kartar Singh Bhadana was a nominee of the "Lok Dal" for the said constituency. The rest of the respondents were the other candidates who had filed their nomination papers. The election was actually held on 22-2-2000. Respondent No. 1 was declared elected as he secured 37, 174 votes.

2. Now the petitioner has brought the present Election Petition challenging the election of respondent No. 1 by setting up a case that he got the highest number of valid votes and since respondent No. 1 was not qualified to be a candidate his nomination papers should have been rejected, and therefore, the election of respondent No. 1 be set aside being illegal and unconstitutional and the petitioner be declared as an elected candidate.

3. The general election to the Haryana Assembly was held according to the following schedule :-

@@ (i)Date of filing nomination :27-1-2000(ii)Last Date of filing nomination :3-2-2000





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top