J.S.SEKHON, J.

1. While granting leave to appeal under Section 378(3), of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code) against the orders of acquittal recorded by different trial Courts for offence under Sections 15, 18 and 21 of the Narctoic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the Act) in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6116-M-A of 1991, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6205-M-A of 1991, Criminal Miscellaneous. No. 6469-M-A of 1991 and Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6590-M-A of 1991, the Division Bench of this Court constituted by A. P. Chowdhri and N. K. Kapoor, JJ. noticed the conflict of the views of our High Court in Karam Singh V/s. The State, 1987 (2) C. L. R. 240; Hakam Singh V/s. Union Territory of Chandigarh 1988 Cri. LJ 528, Amit Singh V/s. State of Haryana 1990 (1) C. L. R. 437 and Kuldip Singh V/s. State of Haryana, 1989 C. C. Cases 183 (H. C.). vis-a-vis the view of the Bombay High Court, in Abdul Satar V/s. The State, 1989 Cri. LJ 430 (D. B. Bombay High Court), Suraj Mal Kanhiya Lal Soni V/s. State of Gujarat, 1991 Cri. LJ (May Part) 1483 (D. B. Gujarat High Court) and Richhpal Singh V/s. The State, 1989 Drugs Cases 97 (1989 Cri LJ 51 NOC) (D. B. D