SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 182

S.K.JAIN
Jetinder Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

1. Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 445/1983 (Jatinder Pal Singh V/s. State of Haryana; 3127/1983 (Mohinder Kumar V/s. State of Haryana; and 27/1983 (Vinod Kumar Jain V/s. State of Haryana) are being disposed of by a common judgement as common question of law and fact is involved therein.

2. The only question surviving for consideration, as directed by the Apex Court vide its judgement of 5/03/1987 relates to the constitutional validity of S. 44-A of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 as enforced in Haryana (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and the notifications issued from time to time under the proviso to the said Section granting extension of the period for the completion of the scheme.

3. The relevant facts for appreciation of the quest on involved briefly are that vide notifications Nos. :

(i) 316 - 3CI - 76/10219 dated 25/03/1976. (ii) 913 - 3CI - 76/29579 dated 2/09/1976 and (iii) 11047 - 3CI - 76/37104 dated 5/11/1976, the Governor of Haryana in exercise of power under Sec. 41(1) of the Act, sanctioned

Development Schemes Nos. 34, 38 and 39 respectively, prepared by Karnal Improvement Trust, Karnal under S. 24 read with Sub-Sec. (2) of S. 28 of the Act. The Improve

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top