SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(P&H) 59

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
J.V.Gupta and M.S.Liberhan JJ.
Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd.
Versus
.
Decided On : JANUARY 22, 1990

Headnote:

EXCISE - Concession - Rescission of Notification - Promissory Estoppel - Applicability - Central Government granted concession from excise duty on the use of non-traditional oils in the manufacture of Vanaspati and other excisable articles. The petitioners, manufacturers of Vanaspati, used the specified oils which were entitled to the concession in the excise duty for the manufacture of Vanaspati. They earned the credit to the extent of the utilization of the non-traditional oils in terms of the Notification and had earned credit of the amount of excise permissible under notification, by utilizing the oils notified. Before the petitioners could utilize the credit earned by them in terms of Notification issued by the respondents and the implied and express assurances made, the respondents rescinded the Notification. The petitioners sought a declaration that the Notification of rescission does not take away the right of the petitioners to utilize the credit earned by them prior to August 25,1989 towards the payment of duty on Vanaspati in terms of Notification, dated March 1,1987. HELD, allowing the petition, that the petitioners are entitled to utilize the credit already earned by them in terms of the Notification dated March 1,1987. If any excise duty has been recovered in excess, than the one payable by the petitioners in terms of the Notification, dated March 1, 1987 the same shall be refunded to the petitioners.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners are manufacturers of Vanaspati. The Central Government granted concession from excise duty on the use of non-traditional oils in the manufacture of Vanaspati and other excisable articles. The petitioners used the specified oils which were entitled to the concession in the excise duty for the manufacture of Vanaspati. They earned the credit to the extent of the utilization of the non-traditional oils in terms of the Notification and had earned credit of the amount of excise permissible under notification, by utilizing the oils notified. Before the petitioners could utilize the credit earned by them in terms of Notification issued by the respondents and the implied and express assurances made, the respondents rescinded the Notification.

Finding of the Court:

The petitioners are entitled to utilize the credit already earned by them in terms of the Notification dated March 1,1987. If any excise duty has been recovered in excess, than the one payable by the petitioners in terms of the Notification, dated March 1, 1987 the same shall be refunded to the petitioners.

Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to utilize the credit already earned by them in terms of the Notification dated March 1,1987?

Ratio Decidendi: The Central Government is the delegate of the Union of India and has been conferred with a power to grant exemption from payment of excise or grant the concession in payment of excise duty. The Central Government is further authorised to frame rules under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It authorises the Central Government to collect the excise as well as to prescribe the manner in which it is to be collected. Under the rules, duty is leviable as soon as the excisable goods are produced but it can be collected only when the goods are removed from the factory premises. In the Finance Act of 1987, the Central Government was authorised to provide for giving credit of sums of money with respect to the raw material used for the manufacture of excisable product. As a consequence of the said provision, the rules were amended and amended rules were promulgated in 1987. Reference may be made to Rule 57K of the Central Excise Rules.

Final Decision: The petition is allowed, with no order as to costs.

Judgment

M.S.Liberhan, J.

1. This order of ours shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 11654,11655,11656,11657,12309,12310,12579,12664 and 13056 of 1989. Since the material facts are common and so are questions of law raised in these petitions, it can be fairly recorded that the petitions raise common questions of law.

2. It is expedient to collate the facts leading up to these Writ Petitions. The facts have been taken from Civil Writ Petition No. 11654 of 1989. Vanaspati is an excisable item. The petitioners are its manufacturers. It can be manufactured by hydrogenation of vegetable oil and subjecting them to various other processes like neutralising, bleaching and deodorisation etc. The oils used in this process are known as traditional oils in the trade and it is so understood by the persons in the trade. The manufacturer of Vanaspati can also use for its manufacture the minor oils like Rice Bran Oil, Mahua Oil, Water-melon seed Oil, Solvent extracted cottonseed Oil etc. They are known as non-traditional oils in the trade amongst the manufacturers and the persons dealing with Vanaspati. Utilising the non- traditional oils for the manufacture of Vanaspati is a time consuming and costlier process, than its manufacture by hydrogenation of traditional oils.

3. The Union of India with an object to cut the import of excisable oils, to save the foreign exchange, to encourage the utilisation, or consumption of indigenously available non-traditional oils and to make it feasible as well as financially viable for the manufacture of Vanaspati and further to allure the manufacturers of Vanaspati to utilise the same for its manufacture, and with a further object of granting incentive for the greater production of non-traditional oils in the country, granted various concessions from excise duty and also in other excisable goods. The Central Government introduced a scheme granting concession from excise duty on the use of the non-traditional oils in the manufacture of Vanaspati and other excisable articles. The scheme proposing the excise concession on the Vanaspati and other articles for the use of various non-traditional oils, was issued on March 1,1987 and the items were specified.

4. The Notification was issued under Rule 57-K of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules). The vegetable oils listed in the Notification, for the production of the Vanaspati, conferring a right to concession from excise, were defined as inputs. Under the Scheme the manufacturer of the final product of Vanaspati earned credit of money at the rates specified, for concession in the excise duty, for the use of inputs. The manufacturers were entitled to the stipulated credit subject to the conditions, (i) that the credit was to be taken only in respect of the quantity of oil subjected to hydrogenation on or after March 1,1987 for the manufacture of final product; (ii) the credit was to be taken only on the date on which the specified oils entitled to concession were so hydrogenated; and (iii) the accounting period for such credit was a month. Further under the Scheme, the manufacturer could utilise the credit earned in any calendar month only in the next succeeding month. The credit could be utilised by adjustment against the payment of excise duty on the final product and that too at a specified rate. A ceiling was put on the amount of credit to be utilised for payment of excise duty on any individual clearance of the final products, it was not to exceed Rs. 1,000/- per metric tonne of vegetable products cleared. It was provided that the manufacturer shall not be entitled to the refund or adjustment against payment of excise duty on any item other than the final product nor it could be utilised for payment of excise duty on any other excisable goods under any circumstances. It was made incumbent for the manufacturer to produce a certificate within five months from the taking of credit or such extended period from the Deputy Directo









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top