SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 481

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Vineet Handa – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Harpreet Kaur Dhillon, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik J.: - The petitioner has approached this Court invoking its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) for quashing of FIR No.32 dated 06.02.2008 under Sections 420/406/409/415/468/471/34/120-B IPC, (hereinafter referred to as ‘FIR No. 32’), registered at Police Station DLF Phase II, Gurgaon and also for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2011(Annexure P-3) passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon, vide which the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon, declined to accept the cancellation report dated 17.01.2009 filed by the investigating agency in FIR No.32, noted above.

2. The sole contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the impugned order dated 08.03.2011 (Annexure P-3) is liable to be stayed on the basis of parity as the impugned order has been stayed by this Court vide order dated 18.07.2011 passed in Criminal Misc.- M No.21409 of 2011 because the impugned order dated 08.03.2011 (Annexure P-3) passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon, was a composite one vide which he declined to accept the cancellation report.

3. During the course of heari
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top