SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 619

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina
CWP 14046 of 2012 (O&M)
Raman
v.
State of Haryana & Ors.
{Decided on 02/07/2013}

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana.
For the Respondents no.2 to 4:Mr. K.S. Malik, Advocate.
Mr. Anil Malhotra, Amicus Curiae.

Headnote:Torts--Electrocution--Compensation--Child aged 4 years, come into contact with live transmission wire--He suffered amputation of both the arms and a leg--Electricity Board and State held to be jointly and severally liable for compensation and medical expenses--Compensation of 60 lacs awarded to victim.

       (A) Electricity Act, 2003, S.68--Electrocution--A child aged four years, came into contact with a naked 11 Kv transmission line passing over the roof of his father's house--He suffered Amputation of both arms and right leg--Liability of Electricity Board--Contention since lines were laid 30 years ago in open fields; petitioner has raised unauthorized construction and an iron angle put by petitioner to keep live wire away which caused the accident therefore they are not liable--Contention rejected on following grounds--

       (i) As per Act and Rules, periodic vigil by agents and servants of the Nigam is to be done.

       (ii) Nigam having drawn active transmission lines 30 years ago cannot sit complacently and claim no fault because construction activity has spilled beyond the lal lakir or phirni of the village.

       (iii) Nigam has given lawful domestic electricity connections from that transmission live and collect tariff through bills--Therefore, they cannot complain of unauthorized construction.

       (iv) Even if father of victim had a hand in placing the iron angle to keep at boy a potentially offending live wire, he should be understood as closing so as an act of self preservation--This may be also seen akin to the right of private defence in criminal law.

       (B) Torts--Electrocution--Compensation--Child aged 4 years, come into contact with live transmission wire--He suffered amputation of both the arms and a leg--Electricity Board and State held to be jointly and severally liable for compensation and medical expenses--Compensation of 60 lacs awarded to victim on following terms:-

       (i) Additionally, all expenses to be incurred in securing artificial/robotic limbs etc for minor presently and in the future including stem cell technology.

       (ii) Rs.30 lacs for loss of enjoyment of life, trauma suffered and to act as a guard against neglect and dependence on others, loss of future employment and all of the agony--This amount would be made available with interest on reaching the age of 21 years, as a financial security and building block for the future.

       (iii) Rs.20,000/- p.m is the expenses for paid care givers/attendants--To earn interest of such amount a corpus of Rs.30 lacs @ 8.5% interest on long term fixed deposits is required--Directed accordingly.

       (iv) In case, when minor comes of employable age, if Nigam finds victim qualified for any post, it may offer permanent employment on compassionate grounds--In case he is employed then amount of Rs.30 lacs plus interest receivable at age 21 years shall be put in his provident Fund/pension account.

       (v) Nigam would also pay compensation of Rs.2 lacs immediately to the mother of minor victim for trauma, mental shock, pain and agony caused to her. (Para 40)

       

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rajiv Narain Raina, J.: - In a tragic and heart rending accident caused by electrocution, a four year old child Raman on coming into contact with a naked 11KV transmission line passing over the roof of his father’s house built in village Sanoli Khurd, District Panipat has suffered as a consequence triple amputation of the limbs, a rare condition, leading to something even worse than 100% permanent disability.

2. The injured Raman has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution through his father, Manoj Kumar claiming compensation from the respondents-Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (for short “the Nigam”) and the State of Haryana for loss of both arms and the left leg severed leaving stumps at a tender age with almost all avenues open to earn and support himself in the future shut and so also to be denied the small pleasures of growing up to manhood and to do ordinary things that children do, and left to face life completely dependent on others till he lives. He may never find a bride or start a family. He may never be able to feed himself both literally and metaphorically until the magic world of modern science intervenes through prosthetic limbs, robotics and futuristic stem cell technology at unforeseeable cost. The old proverb goes -God helps those who help themselves- but that may not be apt in this case, since this Court exists and exists to bring succour to the helpless, the downtrodden, the disabled and the invalid who are forsaken by destiny. To visualize and understand the magnitude of the plight of the petitioner his photographs are the best testimony of what is left of him and which are made part of the order as Appendix 1.

3. Notice of motion was issued on the petition by this Court on 26.7.2012. The Nigam has contested the case by filing a written statement. Injury by electrocution suffered on 3.11.2011 has not been disputed or that the child came in contact with an 11KV naked wire passing over the roof of the house built by the petitioner’s father in village Sanoli Khurd, District Panipat where he lives with his family. It is explained that the 11KV transmission line was erected and installed three decades ago then passing over agricultural fields. Over a period of time, as is the historical necessity, many constructions have come up outside the abadi deh or lal lakir of the village where the petitioner’s father constructed a house for his family about a decade ago where the unfortunate incident happened.

4. Of the cluster of electricity transmission lines which pass over the house of the petitioner from one electricity pole to the other, one of them hangs dangerously close to one corner of the roof. It has been transfixed with an insulator installed on an angle iron to hold it up and keep it out of harm’s way. To understand the situation nothing would serve better than the photograph of the insulator with the angle iron which is appended with this order as Appendix 2.

5. The house of the petitioner’s father is a shop-cum-residence where he works out from to do his spare part business. The house lies amidst a large number of dwellings which have come up apparently without legal sanction or permission of any competent authority or before informing the electricity department-the Nigam- power corporation respondent, that the passing wires may injure man being drawn much prior in time to the coming of the affected family on the land.

6. It has been explained in the written statement filed by the SDO (Operations) Sub Division, UHBVNL, Chhajpur, District Panipat that the insulator/angle iron seen in the photograph (P-4 to the petition and Appendix 2 to this order) was not installed by any employee of the electricity department. The father of the petitioner is blamed squarely in installing the insulator himself on the edge of the roof of the house to keep at bay the high tension live wire so as not to touch brick and mortar. Therefore, there is no negligence on the part of the depart




































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top