SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 588

RITU BAHRI, PARAMJEET SINGH, NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, INDERJIT SINGH
Amarbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Present:Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate, Mr. Gurminder Singh, Advocate, Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate.
Mr. Pradeep Kumar Bajaj, Advocate, Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate, Mr. R.S. Pandher, Advocate, Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Kushaldeep S. Sandhu, Advocate, Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate, Mr. O.P. Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, Mr. G.S. Bal, Advocate, Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate, Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate, Mr. Sumer Singh Brar, Advocate, Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate, Mr. M.C. Berry, Addl. A.G, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Ms. Ritu Bahri, J.:- This judgment shall dispose of cases of 57 petitioners who had approached the Supreme Court against the judgment of Full Bench in CWP No. 8421 of 2002 and their cases have been remanded back by the Supreme Court i.e. CWP Nos. 8423, 8434, 8585, 8587, 8592, 8595, 8740, 8741, 8742, 8954, 8957, 14429, 8889, 8447, 8446, 8739, 8591, 14187, 13943, 8449, 8594, 8440, 8431, 8441, 8442, 8430, 10796, 8540, 8422, 8590, 8587, 8596, 8421, 14358, 19062, 8593, 14189, 14188, 8587 of 2002, 1548 of 2003 as well as cases of 24 petitioners who did not approach the Supreme Court against the order dated 07.07.2003 but filed the review applications i.e. CWP Nos. 8424, 8429, 8433, 8547, 8558, 8584, 8586, 8587, 8588, 8589, 14429, 14457, 14599, 10727 of 2002, 2459 of 2003, 1246, 11362 of 2008.

2. The following matters are for disposal which stand referred to the Full Bench on remand from the Supreme Court in the case of Inderpreet Singh Kahlon and others v. State of Punjab, [2006(3) Law Herald (SC) 2338] : 2006(5) JT 352. The judgment and termination orders of the candidates were set aside. Three categories of candidates can be segregated for scrutiny. The first category pertains















































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top