IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HEMANT GUPTA, FATEH DEEP SINGH, JJ.
Abdul Latif Adam Momin & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India through Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. – Respondents
CR.A.No.292-DB of 2009, CR.A.No.632-DB of 2008, CR.A.No.725-DB of 2008
Decided on: 25.02.2014
Hemant Gupta, J.
1. This order shall dispose of aforementioned three criminal appeals directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Patiala on 05.02.2008 in Sessions Case No.15 of 20.07.2000, whereby accused-appellants namely Abdul Latif Adam Momin; Dilip Kumar Bhujel and Bhupal Man Damai @ Yusuf Nepali were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 363, 342, 467, 506 read with Section 120 B IPC; under Section 25 of the Arms Act and under Section 4 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 and sentenced to undergo for varying terms as mentioned in the order of sentence.
2. CR.A.No.292-DB of 2009 is preferred by Abdul Latif & CR.A. No.632-DB of 2008 is preferred by Dilip Kumar Bhujel and Yusuf Nepali whereas CR.A. No.725-DB of 2008 has been preferred by the Central Bureau of Investigation. All these appeals are being taken up for hearing together being directed against common judgment. For the facility of references, appellant Abdul Latif Adam Momin shall be hereinafter referred to as ‘Abdul Latif’, whereas appellants Bhupal Man Damai @ Yusuf Nepali and Dilip Kumar Bhujel shall be referred to as ‘Yusuf Nepali’ and ‘Bhujel’ respectively, whereas the Central Bureau of Investigation shall be referred to as ‘the prosecution’. During the course of investigation, the prosecution has found that the accused were using different names at different times. Therefore, to facilitate the prosecution case, the names of the accused along with names used and their relation with the Maulana Masood Azhar, the released prisoner from Indian Jail as a result of negotiations with Government of India, are as under:
Serial number as an accused before the trial Court Names Used Remarks
1. Ibrahim Athar @ Ahmed Ali Mohd. Ali Shaikh @ Javed Amjad Siddiqui @ A.A. Shaikh @ Chief Brother of Masood Azhar
2. Sunny Ahmed Qazi @ S.A. Qazi @ Burger
3. Shahid Sayeed Akhtar @ S.A. Sayeed @ Moti @ Khalid @ Doctor
4. Zahoor Ibrahim Mistry @ Z.I. Mistry @ Bhola
5. Shakir @ Rajesh Gopal Verma @ R.G. Verma @ Farooq Abdul Aziz Siddiqui @ Shankar
6. Abdul Latif Adam Momin
7. Bhupal Man Damai @ Yusuf Nepali
8. Abdul Rauf Brother of Masood Azhar
9. Yusuf Azhar @ Mohd. Salim Sister's husband of Masood Azhar
10. Dilip Kumar Bhujel
All the aforesaid ten accused hereinafter shall be referred to as A-1 to A-10 respectively.
3. The appellants namely Abdul Latif and Bhujel are the Indian Nationals, whereas appellant Yusuf Nepali is a national of Nepal. All other accused are the Pakistan Nationals and are Proclaimed Offenders.
4. The brief facts leading to the present appeals are that an Indian Airlines Flight No.IC–814 ‘Kathmandu to Delhi’ with 179 passengers including 24 foreigners and 11 crew members took off from Tribhuvan International Airport, Kathmandu at 16.10 hours on 24.12.1999. When the Flight was in the range of Air Traffic Control Varanasi after being airborne for 45 minutes, the said Flight was hijacked. The hijacker, five in number, directed the Pilot to take the Flight towards West later said to Lahore. PW-1 Capt. Devi Saran deposed that for want of fuel, the Aircraft cannot be flown to Lahore. The Lahore Air Traffic Control also did not permit the air-craft to land at Lahore. Since the air-craft was running short on fuel, the hijackers permitted the Flight to land at Amritsar for re-fueling at 19.00 hours. The hijackers did not permit the Pilot to stop the engine and in order to scare the crew and the authorities’ inflicted passengers namely Rupin Katyal and Satnam Singh with knife blows.
5. The Air-craft took off at 19.45 hours from Amritsar without any refueling. After being airborne for 4/5 minutes, the Pilot sought permission to land at Lahore. However, initially the Air Traffic Control, Lahore did not permit the air-craft to land at Lahore, but in view of low fuel and the fact that there was no option for the Pilot, but to crash land the air-craft, Air Traffic Control, Lahore permitted the ai
State of Maharasthra Vs. Som Nath Thapa (1996) 4 SCC 659
State of U.P. Vs. M.K. Anthony
Pulukuri Kotayya vs. King-Emperor AIR 1947 PC 67
Zahiruddin vs. King-Emperor AIR 1947 PC 75
Niranjan Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Ronny Alias Ronald James Alwaris vs. State of Maharashtra
Nirpal Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Munshi Singh Gautam Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2005) 9 SCC 631
State of Maharashtra v. Bharat Chaganlal Raghani (2001) 9 SCC 1
Kehar Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration) (1988) 3 SCC 609
Sardul Singh Caveeshar vs. State of Bombay AIR 1957 SC 747
Hari Charan Kurmi vs. State of Bihar (1964) 6 SCR 623
State (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru (2005) 11 SCC 600
Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali Vs. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi (2012) 2 SCC 584
Srinivas Krishnarao Kango Vs. Narayan Devji Kango & others AIR 1954 SC 379
Subramania Goundan v. State of Madras AIR 1958 SC 66
State of M.P. v. Sheetla Sahai (2009) 8 SCC 617
Krishna Govind Patil vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 1963 SC 1413
K.G. Premshanker Vs. Inspector of Police
Noor Mohd. Mohd. Yusuf Momin Vs. State of Maharashtra (1970) 1 SCC 696
Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1957 SC 216
Pyare Lal Bhargava v. State of Rajasthan AIR 1963 SC 1094
Dara Singh Vs. Republic of India (2011) 2 SCC 490
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. SIDCO Leathers Ltd.
Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2010) 6 SCC 1
Mohd. Ajmal Amir Kasab Vs. State of Maharashtra
Kehar Singh vs. State (Delhi Admn.) (1988) 3 SCC 609
Major E.G. Barsay v. State of Bombay AIR 1961 SC 1762
Mirza Akbar vs. King Emperor AIR 1940 PC 176
State (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru (2005) 11 SCC 600
Firozuddin Basheeruddin & others Vs. State of Kerala
M. Jakati Vs. S.M. Borkar AIR 1959 SC 282
Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali Vs. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) (2012) 9 SCC 408
Smt. Nandini Satpathy Vs. P.L. Dani & another AIR 1978 SC 1025
Sital Das Vs. Sant Ram & others AIR 1954 SC 606
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Kandimalla Subbaiah AIR 1961 SC 1241
Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1957 SC 637
Kishan Singh Vs. Gurpal Singh (2010) 8 SCC 775
Karan Singh Vs. State of M.P. AIR 1965 SC 1037
Kharkan & others Vs. State of U.P. AIR 1965 SC 83
Kumar Gopika Raman Roy Vs. Atal Singh
N.V. Subba Rao Vs. State (2013) 2 SCC 162
Baliya Vs. State of M.P. (2012) 9 SCC 696
Brijbasi Lal Shrivastava Vs. State of M.P. (1979) 4 SCC 521
Puran v. State of Punjab (I) AIR 1953 SC 459
Parmananda Pegu v. State of Assam (2004) 7 SCC 779
Pritam Singh vs. State of Punjab AIR 1956 SC 415
Aloke Nath Dutta Vs. State of W.B. (2007) 12 SCC 230
Akki Veeraiah Vs. State (Inspector
Jameel Ahmed v. State of Rajasthan (2003) 9 SCC 673
Ram Chandra & another Vs. State of U.P. AIR 1957 SC 381
Gramophone Company of India Ltd. Vs. Birendra Bahadur Pandey & others AIR 1984 SC 667
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.