RAJESH BINDAL, J.

1. This order will dispose of a bunch of petitions bearing CWP Nos. 20788, 23671, 23721, 24700, 24847, 24966, 25336, 25848, 26508, 26833, 27005, 27006, 27032, 27448, 27458, 27526 of 2015, 787, 788, 798, 1868, 2197, 3196, 3748, 3768, 6796, 8820, 18377 and 19413 of 2016, as the issues involved in all the petitions are identical.

FACTS OF THE CASES

CWP No. 20788 of 2015

2. The petitioner claims itself to be a registered dealer under the provisions of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short the Act). The assessment of the petitioner for the year 2011-12 was framed vide order dated 15.5.2013. Notice under Section 34 of the Act for revision of the assessment order was issued on 4.6.2015. The revisional authority passed the order on 3.7.2015. The revisional order has been challenged, inter-alia, on the ground that the same is without jurisdiction.

CWP No. 23671 of 2015

3. Assessment of the petitioner for the year 2010-11 was framed vide order dated 30.4.2012 while accepting the returns filed by the petitioner. No