DAYA CHAUDHARY, SUDHIR MITTAL
Sejal Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sudhir Mittal, J.
1. This judgment shall dispose of aforementioned writ petitions as identical issues have been raised therein. Facts are being extracted from CWP-16886/2019 titled as Sejal Garg vs. State of Punjab and Others.
2. The petitioner did her schooling from a school situated in Ludhiana and cleared her senior secondary examination in the academic session 2018-19. She has passed her secondary school examination also from the same school. Aspiring to serve as a Doctor in the State of Punjab, she applied for National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (UG) 2019 (for short NEET 2019) as a candidate belonging to the State of Punjab and took the test scheduled for 5.5.2019. The result was declared on 5.6.2019 and the petitioner secured All India Rank of 15494 obtaining 572 marks out of 720. On 6.6.2019, the State of Punjab issued notification on the subject of admission to MBBS/BDS courses in medical and dental institutions in the State of Punjab for the academic session 2019. As per this notification, centralized counseling was to be conducted by respondent No. 3-Baba
Anant Madaan vs. State of Haryana
Ajit Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others
Ajit Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others
Dr. Gulshan Parkash and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others
Dr. Jagadish Saran vs. Union of India
Dr. Pradeep Jain vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.