ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Gaurav Budhwar – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. - The petitioner has sought regular bail in FIR No.RCCHG512016S0014 (Annexure P-2) dated 06.10.2016, under Sections 120- B, 148, 149, 186, 188, 307, 353, 395, 427, 436 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, besides Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, registered at Police Station CBI, SCB, Chandigarh, earlier registered as FIR No.118 dated 27.02.2016 at Police Station Urban Estate Rohtak.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner along with other accused during the Jat agitation had attacked the residence and other establishments of the complainant. They are alleged to have indulged in arson and the buildings were set ablaze. Similarly situated co-accused have been released on bail by various orders, copies whereof are at Annexures P-6, P-7, P-8 and P-10. He also contends that no person was injured in the occurrence. The petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case. He also states that the conclusion of the trial in the instant case is likely to take a long time as charges have not yet been framed while
Abdul Rehman Antulay and ors. Vs. R.S. Nayak and anr.
Anil Kumar Yadav Vs. State (NCT) of Delhi and Anr.
Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Vs. Vijay Sai Reddy
Gobarbhai Naranbhai Singala Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors.
Hussainara Khatoon and others Vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar Patna
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and another Vs. Union of India and others
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.