SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 1924

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Gaurav Budhwar – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kunal Dawar, Advocate, Sumeet Goel, Advocate, D.R. Singla, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. - The petitioner has sought regular bail in FIR No.RCCHG512016S0014 (Annexure P-2) dated 06.10.2016, under Sections 120- B, 148, 149, 186, 188, 307, 353, 395, 427, 436 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, besides Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, registered at Police Station CBI, SCB, Chandigarh, earlier registered as FIR No.118 dated 27.02.2016 at Police Station Urban Estate Rohtak.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner along with other accused during the Jat agitation had attacked the residence and other establishments of the complainant. They are alleged to have indulged in arson and the buildings were set ablaze. Similarly situated co-accused have been released on bail by various orders, copies whereof are at Annexures P-6, P-7, P-8 and P-10. He also contends that no person was injured in the occurrence. The petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case. He also states that the conclusion of the trial in the instant case is likely to take a long time as charges have not yet been framed while

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top