JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J.

1. The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.

2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.

3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent in the quashing petition.

4. On 23.5.2022, the aggrieved person Ravi Mehta (Respondent no.2) appeared before the JMIC, Hansi and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 26.5.2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.

ANALYSIS & REASONING:

5. Despite the severe opposition of the State's counsel to this compromise, the following aspects would be relevant to conclude this petition: -

a) The ac