Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Jaspal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 141 | 3.11.2020 | Qila Lal Singh | 326, 452, 323, 148, 149 IPC |
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent.
4. On 22.3.2021, the aggrieved person Rahul Kumar (R-2) appeared before the JMIC, Batala and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 25.3.2021, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat. Further, the report also highlighted that one of the accused Munni named in the FI
Non-compoundable offences can be quashed if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and the continuation of criminal proceedings will not advance the reformative purposes of jurisprudence.
Non-compoundable offences can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and the victim has no objection, considering the nature and gravity of the offence,....
The main legal point established is that the High Court can invoke its inherent powers under section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings, even for non-compoundable offences, if it deems it necessa....
The main legal point established is that the inherent power under section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash non-compoundable offences based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offence, the ....
The Court can quash non-compoundable offences under its inherent jurisdiction if the settlement between the parties justifies the exercise of such power and the continuation of the prosecution would ....
The main legal point established is that the High Court may invoke its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash a criminal proceeding based on a compromise, even if the offenses are non-compoun....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the wide ambit of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIR and consequent proceedings based on compromise, especially in cases involving....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to quash FIR and consequent proceedings based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offences and the impact on publi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR and consequent proceedings based on a compromise, considering the nature....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
