RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Harjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J (Oral). - Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of FIR No.10 dated 2.10.2018 under Sections 420, 406, 498-A IPC registered at Police Station Women, District Ludhiana (Rural) and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise (Annexure P-2).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has handed over a demand draft of Rs.3,50,000/- to respondent no.2, who is present in person.
3. FIR in question was got registered by complainant-respondent No.2 and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from the compromise(Annexure P-2). On the basis of the same, the petitioners are invoking the inherent power of this Court by praying that continuation of these proceedings would be a futile exercise and an abuse of process of the Court and thus, the FIR in question and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed in the interest of justice.
4. This Court vide orders dated 19.7.2021 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrat
B.S.Joshi and others vs State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675
Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another (2012) 10 SCC 303
Narinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another
The court's decision emphasized the importance of considering the nature of the offenses, the voluntary compromise between the parties, and the objective of securing the ends of justice in exercising....
Quashing of FIR based on a compromise between the parties is justified when it would secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of the Court.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have entered into a compromise, continuation of criminal proceedings may be an abuse of process of the Court, and quashing the pr....
The court's decision was primarily based on the nature of the offenses, the voluntary compromise between the parties, and the precedents set by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court in similar....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the power to quash a criminal proceeding based on a compromise must be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the pro....
The power of the Court to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, as provided in Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Section 320 Cr.P.C., should be exercised to secure the ends of j....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have entered into a compromise in certain types of cases, continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of process of the ....
The main legal principle established is that when parties have voluntarily settled their dispute, the court may quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to secure the ends of justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have amicably settled their dispute, the continuation of criminal proceedings may be an abuse of process of the Court, and quashi....
The main legal point established is that when parties have entered into a compromise, the court may quash criminal proceedings if continuation would be an abuse of process of the court and securing t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.