SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 211

ALKA SARIN
Simarjit Kaur @ Simerjeet Kaur @ Simarjeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Maninder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

Alka Sarin, J. - The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 16.04.2022 (Annexure P-12) whereby application filed by the defendant-petitioner for rejection of the affidavit of witness Narjit Singh Dhillon has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that in the present case vide order dated 21.07.2017, the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kurukshetra directed the defendant-petitioner to lead her evidence first as burden to prove issue nos.l and 2 was upon the defendant. Thereafter, the defendantpetitioner closed her evidence vide a separate statement dated 29.01.2020 and the case was adjourned for rebuttal evidence. The plaintiff-respondent had not led any evidence in affirmative. Vide order dated 09.02.2021 the plaintiff-respondent was ready to deposit the diet money for the witnesses. Thereafter, the affidavit of one Narjit Singh Dhillon was filed in evidence by the plaintiff-respondent. The defendant-petitioner moved an application (Annexure P-10) for rejection of the affidavit of Narjit Singh Dhillon on the ground that the plaintiff-respondent could not be directed to lead eviden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top