IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.
Aryan Singh & Ors.. – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr. – Respondents
CRM-M-54107-2021 with CRM-M-8233-2022
Decided On : 04-05-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of fir based on allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding malicious prosecution. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. discussion on credibility of evidence. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's observations on investigation credibility. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. final conclusion on the transfer of investigation. (Para 18 , 38) |
| 6. abuse of process due to mala fide allegations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. - Both the above-mentioned petitions shall be disposed of by this common Prayer made in the above mentioned petitions is for quashing of the FIR No.RC0512020S0001 dated 29.4.2020 registered at Police Station State Grime Branch, Chandigarh under Sections 452 , 323, 365, 342, 186, 225, 506 and 120-B IPC (earlier registered as FIR No.195 dated 30.8.2014 under Sections 452 , 323, 365, 342, 225, 186, 506, 120-B IPC at Police Station Phase-1, Mohali) as well as all the subsequent proceedings arising out of the same.
2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner-Gautam Cheema submits that initially, FIR No.195 dated 30.8.2019 was got registered by ASI Dilbagh Singh at Police Station Phase-I, Mohali against petitioner- Gautam Cheema, the then Inspector General of Police, one Ajay |Chaudhary and two unknown persons with the allegations that on 26.8.2014 at about 10.45 p.m. he was the duty officer when HC Ramesh Kumar brought a person in the Police Station. He disclosed his name as Sumedh Gulati resident of Mohali and he was a proclaimed offender in FIR No.62 dated 23.3.2014 under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Phase-I, Mohali. When ASI Dilbagh Singh started interrogating him, in the meantime, petitioner- Gautam Cheema, along with Ajay Chaudhary and two unidentified persons came at Police Station in a private car and after disclosing his identity took Sumedh Gulati with him. ASI Dilbagh Singh followed him and they reached Max Hospital, Mohali, where he saw that petitioner-Gautam Cheema, along with 3-4 persons, were present in Room No.2202, where one Kricpy Khera wife of Devinder Singh Gill was admitted.
3. Later on, from the statements of other witnesses, he came to know that the petitioner forcibly took him there and extended threat and gave slap and also issued threat to Kricpy Khera wife of Devinder Singh Gill to withdraw the complaints against him. Thereafter, ASI Dilbagh Singh rescued him and brought him back to the Police Station and arrested him as per rules vide DDR No.48 dated 26.8.2014. On the basis of his complaint, FIR No.195 under Sections 452 , 323, 365, 342, 225, 186, 506 and 120-B IPC was registered against petitioner-Gautam Cheema, Ajay Chaudhary and two unidentified persons.
4. Learned Senior Counsel has further submitted that even one FIR No.135 dated 2.9.2014 was also got registered under Sections 452 , 342, 323, 354, 506 and 120-B IPC read with Section 25 of the ARMS ACT at the instance of aforesaid Kricpy Khera wife of Devinder Singh Gill with the allegations that the petitioner forcibly entered in her room along with Ajay Chaudhary and by pointing a pistol towards Sumedh Gulati, he threatened both of them.
5. Learned Senior Counsel further has submitted that, later on, both the sides gave applications before the higher authorities for conducting the proper investigation and the petitioner-accused alleged that he has been falsely implicated due to mala fide motive of the complainant side whereas even complaints are made by Kricpy Khera with regard to FIR No.135 for fair investigation of the case. Learned Senior Counsel has then referred to an order dated 4.3.2020 passed in CRM-M-30833-2017 filed by Kricpy Khera and others Vs. State of Punjab in which a prayer was made to transfer the investigation of FIR No.135 to CBI as well as another CRM-M-30829-2017 filed by Kricpy Khera and another Vs. State of Punjab and others for transfer of investigation of present FIR No.195 to CBI.
6. Learned Senior Counsel also submits that though the petitioner was not
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. & Others vs. Mohd. Sharaful Haque & Another (2005) 1 SCC 122
Inder Mohan Goswami vs. State of Uttaranchal (2007) 12 SCC 1
Devendra and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and An-other (2009) 7 SCC 495
State of A.P. vs. Gourishetty Mahesh and Others (2010) 11 SCC 226
M. Mohan vs. The State 2011 (3) SCALE 78
Rajiv Thapar and Others vs. Madan Lal Kapoor (2013) 3 SCC 330
2004(1) RCR(Cri) 233 State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Awadh Kishore Gupta and others
2006(1) RCR(Cri) 324 State of Orrisa and another vs. Saroj Kumar Sahoo
2004(3) RCR(Cri) 831 State of Andra Pradesh vs. Coloconda Linga Swamy and another
2014(2) RCR(Cri) 19 Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki vs. State of Gujarat and others.
2018(3) RCR(Cri) 111 E. Sivakumar vs. Union of India and others
Prosecution of the petitioners was found to be malicious, lacking evidentiary basis for allegations of abduction and threats, leading to the quashing of FIRs under Section 482 CrPC.
Malicious prosecution claims must show prima facie cases are unfounded; mere political allegations do not suffice to quash FIRs without substantive evidence.
The court emphasized the importance of thorough examination of allegations before transferring an investigation to CBI and highlighted the petitioner's failure to register an FIR or seek remedy under....
A petition for quashing criminal proceedings can be dismissed even if one accused has died, as long as there is no legal bar to continuing against the living accused and factual disputes should not b....
The court emphasized that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be sparingly exercised and that the court should not interfere with the investigation unless no cognizable offence is disclosed. I....
The accused has no right to dictate the investigating agency or method of investigation, and the plea of alibi must be substantiated with cogent evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.