IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Fateh Deep Singh , J.
Radhey Shyam & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Sunder Singh & Ors. – Respondents
FAO No.2652 of 2001 (O&M) and FAO No.2661 of 2001 (O&M)
Decided On : 02-05-2022
Motor Vehicles Act - Motor Accident Claims - Section 166 - The court awarded compensation to the claimants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The judgment discusses the liability of the driver, owner, and insurer, and the validity of the driving license and insurance policy.
Fact of the Case:
The court disposed of two claim petitions under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, involving a fatal accident caused by rash and negligent driving. The claimants sought compensation for the loss of their minor children's lives.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the accident was established by evidence, and the driver and owner did not rebut the claimants' case. The court assessed compensation based on the notional income of the deceased children and granted additional amounts for loss of love and affection and last rites.
Issues: The issues included establishing the cause of the accident, determining compensation, and validating the driver's license and insurance policy.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the driver, owner, and insurer were jointly and severally liable to pay compensation. The validity of the driving license and insurance policy was upheld, and the claimants were entitled to the awarded amount.
Final Decision: Both the appeals were disposed of, affirming the compensation awarded to the claimants.
JUDGMENT
Fateh Deep Singh, J. - The Court of learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohtak vide a consolidated Award dated 06.03.2001 disposed off claim petitions bearing No.5 of 2000 titled 'Radhey Shaym & another vs. Sunder Singh & others' and another petition No.6 of 2000 titled 'Maya Devi & another vs. Sunder Singh & others' under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short, 'the Act') and as a consequence of the same had allowed both the claim petitions and awarded Rs. 1.00 lakhin petition No.5 of 2000 and Rs. 80,000/- in claim petition No.6 of 2000 along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petitions till realization. The same is subject matter of challenge in these two first appeals against order filed by claimants Radhey Shyam and Maya.
2. Since in both these matters, common questions of law and facts are involved wherein similar evidence has come about necessitates their joint disposal together by way of this common judgment.
3. It is worthwhile to refer here that the initial records stood destroyed in the fire that engulfed the record room of this Court and thus, the present disposal is based on what remnants are available.
4. Heard Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the claimant/appellants; Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate representing respondent No.3/Insurance Company and perused the records.
5. It was on 02.08.1999 Sonu and Monu both deceased along with others were returning from Haridwar being part of the Kabris and had rested on their way when in the early morning on 03.08.1999 a vehicle make Tata 407 bearing registration No.HR-46A-1870 being driven rashly and negligently at a very high speed by respondent No.l Sunder Singh and which vehicle was owned by Suresh Kumar respondent No.2 and insured with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. respondent No.3, struck against the resting pilgrims leading to death ofthese two persons. FIR No.121 dated 03.08.1999 under Sections 279 and 304-A etc. IPC against the driver was registered with Police Station Israna.
6. It is undisputed that deceased Sonu was a student of 8th class while deceased Monu was a student of 6th class and the claim petitions have been preferred by their unfortunate parents being both brothers, seeking compensation for the loss of their lives.
7. Driver and owner did not put in appearance. The insurer in their reply denied the averments for want of knowledge of the accident taking a plea that the insurer was not liable to pay compensation as the offending vehicle was being driven contrary to the terms and conditions of the insurance policy and denied any right of the claimants going to the extent of taking a plea that Sunder Singh driver of the offending vehicle was not having legal, valid and effective driving licence at the time of accident. The Tribunal framed the following issues:-
1. Whether present accident is the outcome of rash and negligent driving of respondent No.l Sunder Singh driver while driving vehicle bearing No.HR-46A/1870, on 3.8.99 at 4.30 a.m. in village Dahar, PS Israna, Distt Panipat in which Sonu and Monu died? OPP
2. If issue No.l is proved in affirmative, to what amount and from whom petitioners are entitled to recover? OPP
3. Whether respondent No.l was holding a valid driving licence on the date of accident? OPR
4. Relief.
8. Claimants examined one of the claimant Radhey Shyam as PW1 while claimant Maya Devi stepped into the witness box as PW2 and examined Naresh an eye-witness of the accident as PW3 proving copy of the FIR Ex.P3, post-mortem reports of Sonu and Monu Ex.Pl and Ex.P2 respectively. On the other hand insurer examined RW1 R.K. Sharma, ADM of the insurance company and Licencing Clerk Zile Singh as RW2 proving insurance policy Ex.Rl and thereafter closed their evidence. It is subsequent thereto, the Awards in question were passed.
9. Appreciating the submissions of the two sides, the accident leading to the unfortunate death of both these young brothers who happen to be students of 6th and 8th class
The judgment establishes the joint and several liability of the driver, owner, and insurer under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and upholds the validity of the driving license and insur....
The court applied the principles of compensation calculation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, considering the deceased's potential marriage and dependency, and assessed compensation for l....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the right of legal representatives, including major married and earning sons of the deceased, to apply for compensation in motor accident cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation for death in a road traffic accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, including the assessment of notional income and t....
The court upheld the findings of the trial Tribunal regarding ownership of the offending vehicle, established the validity of the driver's license, and estimated the deceased's income for compensatio....
The court affirmed the validity of awarding compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, adjusting income and future prospects, while rejecting insurer's claims of contributory negligence and liability....
Insurer liable to pay motor accident death compensation to third-party claimants despite driver's invalid licence, with right to recover from owner-driver; enhanced quantum includes 25% future prospe....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.