JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J.

1. The petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim.

2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the victim have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition.

3. After that, the petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the victim has been impleaded as respondent No.2.

4. On 9-3-2022, the victim/ complainant Parminder Kaur, the respondent no. 2 stated before the JMIC Amritsar that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 15-3-2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.

ANALYSIS & REASONING:

5. Despite the severe opposition of the State's counsel to this compromise, the following aspects would be relevant to conclude this petition: -

a) The accused and the pri