ANOOP CHITKARA
Jaspal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 211 | 8.11.2018 | City Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib | 384, 511, 506, 120-B IPC |
The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved persons.
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved persons have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-3.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved persons as respondent no.2 and 3.
4. On 10.11.2022, the victims/complainant(s), respondent no.2 - Raj Kumar (Complainant) and respondent no.3-Rajinder Kumar @ Raju (aggrieved), stated before JMIC, Malout that they have no objection if the Court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. As per the concerned Court's report dated 16.11.2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings arising therefrom without any threat.
Analysis & Reasoning:
5. Despite
Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Laxmi Narayan (2019) 5 SCC 688
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466
Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court can quash the prosecution for non-compoundable offences based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offence, societ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the inherent powers of the High Court under section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash the prosecution even in cases where the offences are non-....
The main legal point established is that the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C can be used to quash proceedings based on a compromise, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends ....
The court can invoke the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences if the settlement is voluntary and in the interest of justice, considering the impact on publi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to quash FIR and consequent proceedings based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offences and the impact on publi....
The main legal point established is that the inherent powers of the court under section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash non-compoundable offences based on a settlement between the parties, consideri....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the wide ambit of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIR and consequent proceedings based on compromise, especially in cases involving....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.