SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 654

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.
Harmeet Kaur - Appellant
Versus
Jorawar Singh - Respondent
TA No. 1105 of 2021 (O&M)
Decided On : 27-10-2022

Advocates:
Mr. R.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner., for the Appellant; Mr. B.S. Mamli, Advocate for the respondent., for the Respondent

The convenience of the wife, economic soundness of both parties, and the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society are crucial factors in considering the transfer of matrimonial disputes.

Headnote:

Transfer of Case - Hindu Marriage Act - The court allowed the transfer of a petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from Kurukshetra to Ferozepur, considering the convenience of the wife, economic soundness of both parties, and the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought the transfer of a petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from Kurukshetra to Ferozepur, citing inconvenience due to distance and reliance on judgments emphasizing the convenience of female litigants.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the transfer, considering the convenience of the wife, economic soundness of both parties, and the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, and directed the Family Court, Kurukshetra to transfer all records to the District Judge, Ferozepur.

Issues: Transfer of matrimonial dispute, convenience of the wife, economic soundness of parties, and prevailing socioeconomic paradigm.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the convenience of the wife, economic soundness of both parties, and the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society as key factors in allowing the transfer of the case.

Final Decision: The petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Kurukshetra, was transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Ferozepur, with specific conditions and directions for the parties and the courts involved.

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral). - Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending in the Family Court, Kurukshetra to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Ferozepur.

2. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner/wife has already filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and a petition/complaint under the Domestic Violence Act at Ferozepur whereas the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act has been filed by the respondent/husband at Kurukshetra.

3. Counsel for the petitioner has also argued that on account of a petition filed by the respondent/husband, the petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the said case as there is a distance of about 280 Kms from Ferozepur to Kurukshetra.

4. Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments 'Sumita Singh vs Kumar Sanjay', 2002 SC 396 and 'Rajani Kishor Pardeshi vs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi', 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue hardships.'

5. Counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the judgment 'N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha,' 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as under:-

    9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.

    10. Further, when two or more proceedings are pending in different Courts between the same parties which raise common question of fact and law, and when the decisions in the cases are interdependent, it is desirable that they should be tried together by the same Judge so as to avoid multiplicity in trial of the same issues and conflict of decisions.'

    6. It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider the family condition of the wife, the custody of the minor child, economic condition of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and most important the convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges and travelling expenses.

    7. Reply on behalf of the respondent/husband has been filed, in which the only objection taken is that the case may be transferred to some other place except Ferozepur.

    8. After hearing the counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the respondent/husband is already appearing before the Family Court, Ferozepur and considering the fact that the petitioner/wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and further in view of the judgments i.e. Sumita Singh's case (supra), Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's case (supra) and N.C.V. Aishwarya's case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, su

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top