AMAN CHAUDHARY
Best Price Modern Wholesale – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Aman Chaudhary, J. - For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. Annexures P-8 to P-13 are taken on record. Main case. The challenge in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to the complaint No.333 of 2015 dated 20.4.2015, Annexure P-1, summoning order dated 15.6.2015, Annexure P-6, and order dated 30.4.2019, Annexure P-2, dismissing the application for discharge filed by the petitioners.
CRM-35478-2022
Factual Aspect:
2. Learned Senior counsel submitted that the petitioners are not the manufacturers but are only sellers of the products that are manufactured by various companies, they being in the business of whole sale. He submitted that a complaint came to be filed by Ashwani Kumar, Food Inspector, Amritsar, on 20.04.2015 against the petitioners and the manufacturer of moong masala vadi (hereinafter referred to as 'the product'), based on a sample drawn on 23.09.2013 from the premises of the petitioners. In this regard, while making a reference to the averments of para 5 of the complaint, Annexure P
Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal and others
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ravi Shankar Srivastava
Jugesh Sehgal Vs. Shamsher Singh Gogi reported as (2009)14 SCC 683
Krishnan and another v. Krishnaveni and another
Prabhu Chawla Vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 2016 SC 4245.
State of Haryana vs. Unique Farmaid (P) Ltd. and others (1999)8 SCC 190
State of Karnataka vs. L. Muniswamy and others AIR 1977 SC 1489
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.