SANJAY VASHISTH
Sukhwinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Vashisth, J. - The present petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C., has been filed by the petitioners, for quashing of FIR No. 78, dated 26.04.2020 (Annexure P-1), for the offences punishable under Sections 435, 34, 506 of IPC and Sections 3(r), 3(s) and 3(2)(iii) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Police Station Cheeka, District Kaithal, and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 04.08.2021 (Annexure P-2).
2. Vide order dated 07.10.2021, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate was to submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order.
3. Pursuant to the order dated 07.10.2021, passed by this Court, the parties have appeared before learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Special Court, Kaithal, and as per report dated 25.10.2021, submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. The operative part of the report received from learned Court be
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another
Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another
The main legal point established is that the court has the power to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine compromise between the parties, especially when it would prevent abuse of the process....
The voluntary nature of the compromise, absence of coercion, and the impact on public interest are crucial factors in deciding to quash criminal proceedings based on compromise.
The court can exercise its power under Section 482 to quash criminal proceedings if the compromise between the parties is genuine and voluntary, and the pendency of the litigation would be an abuse o....
The voluntary nature of the compromise and the court's power to prevent abuse of the process of law by quashing proceedings based on genuine compromises.
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings based on a genuine compromise between private parties to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of compromise in modern society and the need to exercise the power under Section 482 to prevent abuse of the process of court and se....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases where a genuine compromise between th....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases where a compromise between the partie....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and voluntary compromise between the parties, considering the nature of the....
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and voluntary compromise between the parties to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.