IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sanjay Vashisth, J.
Rekha Yadav - Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana & Anr. – Respondents
CRM-M-4204-2020
Decided On : 19-09-2022
Section 482, Cr.P.C. - Quashing of FIR - Section 380 IPC - 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, 2012) 10 SCC 303, (2017) 9 SCC 641, 2021 SCC Online SC 834 - The court quashed the FIR and consequential proceedings based on the compromise between the parties, citing legal principles from various judgments including the need to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, the essence of compromise, and the nature and effect of the offence on the society.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. seeking to quash FIR No. 007, dated 11.01.2019 for the offence punishable under Section 380 IPC, based on a compromise between the parties.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the compromise between the parties was genuine and voluntary, and the pendency of the criminal litigation would be an abuse of process of law. The court referred to legal principles from various judgments to support its decision.
Issues: The main issue was whether the FIR and consequential proceedings should be quashed based on the compromise between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on legal principles from various judgments to quash the FIR, emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, the essence of compromise, and the nature and effect of the offence on the society.
Final Decision: The petition was accepted, and FIR No. 007, dated 11.01.2019 for the offence punishable under Section 380 IPC, and all consequential proceedings were quashed based on the compromise dated 24.01.2020.
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Vashisth, J. - Present petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C., has been filed by Rekha Yadav, for quashing of FIR No. 007, dated 11.01.2019 (Annexure P-1), for the offence punishable under Section 380 IPC, registered at Police Station Gurugram City, District Gurugram, and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.01.2020 (Annexure P-2).
2. Vide order dated 30.01.2020, the affected parties were directed to appear before learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The said Court was also directed to send a detailed report in that regard.
3. In compliance thereof, the affected parties did appear before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurugram, and got recorded their respective statements with regard to the compromise. The operative part of the report received from learned Court below is as under:-
'(I) There is only one victim/complainant in the present case of FIR namely Madhu Gupta wife of Vinjay Kumar Gupta R/o House No. 12, Friends Colony, Jharsa Road, Gurugram.
(ii) Only one person namely Rekha Yadav wife of Shri Ram R/o H. No. 005, Suman ka Makan, Patel Nagar, Gurugram (Hry.) and Permanent addressChuchakwas, District Jhajjar (Hry.) arrayed as accused in the present FIR.
(iii) She has verified that accused Rekha Yadav is not a proclaimed offender.
(iv) She has also verified that accused Rekha is not involved in any other case.
(v) The stage of the present case is of prosecution evidence.
3. In view of statement, undersigned would like to submit that the compromise has been arrived between the parties amicably and same is genuine, voluntarily and without any coercion and undue influence. Besides this, undersigned would like to submit that there is only one accused namely Rekha wife of Shri Ram involved in this case and she is not a proclaimed offender in this case and she is not involved in any other case. The present case is fixed at the stage of prosecution evidence.'
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that due to intervention of the respectable and elderly people of the society, the matter has been resolved and the private parties have effected a compromise dated 24.01.2020 (Annexure P-2). At present, there remains no dispute amongst the private parties. He further submits that in view of the compromise so effected between the private parties, pendency of the impugned FIR and consequential proceedings emanating therefrom would be sheer abuse of the process of law.
5. Learned counsel for the State after going through the statements and the report received from learned Court below, very fairly admits that the private parties have resolved their dispute and effected a compromise. He further submits that he has no objection if the impugned FIR and all the consequential proceedings are quashed on the basis of the compromise.
6. The Full Bench of this Court in the matter of Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, has observed as under:
'(28) To conclude, it can safely be said that there can never be any hard and fast category which can be prescribed to enable the Court to exercise its power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The only principle that can be laid down is the one which has been incorporated in the Section itself, i.e.,
"to prevent abuse of the process of any Court" or "to secure the ends of justice'.
(29) In Mrs. Shakuntala Sawhney v. Mrs. Kaushalya Sawhney and others, Hon'ble Krishna Iyer, J. aptly summoned up the essence of compromise in the following words:
'The finest hour of justice arrives propitiously when parties, despite falling apart, bury the hatchet and weave a sense of fellowship of reunion.'
(30) The power to do complete justice is the very essence of every judicial justice dispensation system. It cannot be diluted by distorted perceptions and is not a slave to anything, except to the caution and circumspection, the standards of
Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and voluntary compromise between the parties to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice.
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases where a genuine compromise between th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of compromise in modern society and the need to exercise the power under Section 482 to prevent abuse of the process of court and se....
The court emphasized the power of the court to quash proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases of compromise between the parties.
The voluntary nature of the compromise and the court's power to prevent abuse of the process of law by quashing proceedings based on genuine compromises.
The court can exercise its power under Section 482 to quash criminal proceedings if the compromise between the parties is genuine and voluntary, and the pendency of the litigation would be an abuse o....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings based on a genuine compromise between private parties to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the....
The court emphasized the significance of compromise in modern society and the wide power of the court to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of law and secure the ends....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and voluntary compromise between the parties, considering the nature of the....
The court has the power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, and can quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and voluntary comprom....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.