ANOOP CHITKARA
Patasho Devi Alias Tasho – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioner under arrest for violating the provisions as mentioned above of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), per the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 148 | 02.03.2022 | City Rohtak, Distt. Rohtak | 20(b)(ii) C of NDPS Act |
2. In paragraph 12 of the bail petition, the accused declares that she has no criminal antecedents of NDPS offences.
3. The police had recovered 32 kilograms of Ganja from Sanjay, who was arrested and during his interrogation made disclosures before the police that they had sold one quital of Ganja to the petitioner which she had destroyed.
4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
5. While opposing the bail, the contention on behalf of the State is that the quantity of contraband involved in the case falls in the commercial category.
REASONING:
6. The substance involved in the present case is Ganja, and
Customs, New Delhi v. AhmadalievaNodira
Lingaram Kodopi v. State of Chhattisgarh
Narcotics Control Bureau v Kishan Lal
Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
Union of India v. Niyazuddin&Anr
Union of India v. Rattan Mallik @ Habul
Union of India v. Sanjeev v. Deshpande
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.