SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 862

ANOOP CHITKARA
Harmanjot Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R.S. Khaira, AAG, Punjab., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. -

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

91

12.05.2022

City Moga, District Moga

376 IPC

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking anticipatory bail.

2. In paragraph 23 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. The victim, who is a working matured adult lady alleged that the petitioner slowly and steadily started making friendship with her and on one day took her to his home where he tried to establish sexual relationships with her. On her refusal, he played Anand Karaj Sahib from his mobile phone and placed the Gutka Sahib and took laavaan phere with her. He also applied vermillion on the parting line of my head. After that, he committed sexual intercourse with her. Later on, he resiled from the said marriage. The petitioner declared the victim to be his wife from that day onwards. Slowly and steadily he will reveal the factum of marriage and he asked her not to reveal it to anyone. The victim stated to the peti

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top