IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRA-S No. 2808 of 2019
Decided On : 01-06-2023
NDPS Act - Conviction under Section 22(c) - [NDPS Act, Section 22(c)] - The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a cogent link in the chain of incriminatory evidence, leading to suspicion about the case property and the charge against the accused. As a result, the appeal was allowed, the judgment convicting and sentencing the appellant was quashed, and the appellant was acquitted of the charge.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act based on the recovery of contraband from his possession. The prosecution's evidence failed to establish a convincing link in the chain of incriminatory evidence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found merit in the appeal and allowed it, quashing the judgment convicting and sentencing the appellant and acquitting him of the charge.
Issues: The main issue was the establishment of a cogent link in the chain of incriminatory evidence to prove the charge against the accused.
Ratio Decidendi: The prosecution's failure to establish a convincing link in the chain of incriminatory evidence led to suspicion about the case property and the charge against the accused, resulting in the appeal being allowed and the appellant being acquitted.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the judgment convicting and sentencing the appellant was quashed, and the appellant was acquitted of the charge.
JUDGMENT :
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
1. The instant appeal is directed against the impugned verdict, as made on 1.8.2019, upon NDPS Case No. 28 of 2018, by the learned Judge (Special Court), Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, where-through in respect of a charge drawn against the accused qua an offence punishable under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act, the learned trial Judge concerned, proceeded to record a finding of conviction against the accused. Moreover, through a separate sentencing order, drawn on 7.8.2019, the learned trial Judge concerned, sentenced the convict to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years, for an offence punishable under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act, besides also imposed, upon the convict sentence of fine, comprised in a sum of Rs. 100,000/- and in default of payment of fine amount, he sentenced the convict to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years.
2. The period of detention undergone by the convict, during the investigations, and, trial of the case, was, in terms of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C. rather ordered to be set off, from the above imposed sentences of imprisonment.
3. The accused-convict becomes aggrieved from the above drawn verdict of conviction, besides also, becomes aggrieved from the consequent therewith sentences of imprisonment, and, of fine as became imposed, upon him, by the learned convicting Court concerned, and, hence has chosen to institute there-against the instant criminal appeal, before this Court.
Factual Background
4. The genesis of the prosecution case, becomes embodied in the appeal FIR, to which Ex.PW-4/C is assigned. The narrations carried in Ex.PW-4/C, are that on 10.10.2017, ASI Nirmal Singh, who was posted at PS Balachaur, District SBS Nagar, along with other police officials, were on patrolling duty in connection with checking of unscrupulous elements from Village Majaari to the direction of Village Mehndpur. When they reached near cremation ground of Village Mehndpur, the police party spotted four persons coming out of motor of tube well in the fields of Jarnail Singh. On the very sight of police party, they got panicked and tried to run away. The police party also chased them, and, one of them fell on the ground in the fields, and, he was apprehended by the police party. The person, who was apprehended threw a polythene bag from his pocket in the fields. The said bag was picked up by the investigating officer concerned, and, it was in torn condition. The said bag contained some intoxicating material including intoxicating powder, three injections and four syringes mark Dispovan. When asked, he revealed his name as Gurjinder Singh @ Ginda and his address. He further disclosed that all the three persons, who succeeded in fleeing away were namely Jatinder Singh @ Jeeti, Amarjit Singh S/o Jarnail Singh, residents of Village Mehndpur and Pardeep Kumar @ Pappi S/o Ram Kumar, resident of Village Saroya. Thereafter, he weighed the intoxicating polythene bag, which Gurjinder Singh had thrown in the fields and was picked up by him, and, it came out to be 372 gms. He put the aforesaid intoxicating powder into a separate parcel and three injections and four syringes were also put into other parcel. Both the parcels were sealed by him with his seal bearing impression “NS.” The accused was arrested and personally searched. The Investigating Officer prepared ruqa, on the basis of which formal FIR was registered.
Investigation proceedings
5. During investigation, the accused was arrested. The investigating officer concerned, inspected the spot of recovery and prepared rough site plan. Statements of the witnesses were recorded. After conclusion of investigations, the investigating officer concerned, proceeded to institute a report under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. before the learned committal Court concerned.
Trial Proceedings
6. The learned trial Judge concerned, made an objective analysis of the incriminatory material, adduced before him. Resultantly, he proceeded to draw
The prosecution must establish a convincing link in the chain of incriminatory evidence to prove the charge against the accused.
The prosecution must establish an unbroken chain of evidence in drug-related cases; failure to do so results in reasonable doubt and acquittal.
The prosecution must maintain an unbroken chain of custody for evidence; failure to do so can result in acquittal due to reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must establish a clear and unbroken chain of custody and evidence handling to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to establish a clear and unbroken link between the FSL report and the seized contraband to prove the charge und....
The necessity of complying with statutory requirements for personal search, preservation of case property, and the production of untampered case property in court as primary evidence to prove the cha....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.