Back
HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Satish – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harnaresh Singh Gill , J. (Oral) - Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
2. Through this petition, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case bearing FIR No.140 dated 08.06.2021, registered at Police Station Chhainsa, Faridabad, under Sections 148, 149, 341, 324, 307, 379-B and 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 (final report submitted under Sections 324, 325, 341, 307, 506 and 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959).
3. As per the prosecution version, the petitioner and other co- accused in furtherance of their common intention had given knife blows to Parveen after having caught hold of him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that it is a case of version and cross-version and it is yet to be ascertained by the trial Court on the basis of evidence as to which was the aggressor party and that a blatant attempt has been made to rope in all the family members of the petitioners in the present case. Learned counsel further contends that the challan stands presented; that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.07.2021, and that the conclusion of the trial would take time to conclude.
5. On the other hand, learned State counsel, assi
The decision to grant bail was based on the nature of injuries, the status of the co-accused, and the prolonged trial process.
The determination of the aggressor in a case of version and cross-version lies within the domain of the trial court, and the lack of criminal antecedents and completion of investigation can be consid....
The court considered the prolonged custody, lack of specific allegations, and delay in trial due to the Covid-19 pandemic as grounds for granting bail.
The court considered the prolonged custody period, delay in trial, and the bail status of co-accused as grounds for granting regular bail to the petitioner.
Granting of bail based on absence of specific allegations or injuries attributed to the petitioner and the likelihood of trial taking time.
The decision to grant bail was influenced by the absence of injuries, the petitioner's prolonged custody, and the unlikelihood of the trial concluding soon.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
