SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1124

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Dharambir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Savita Rana, Advocate; for the Petitioner.; Mr. Munish Sharma, Aag, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. (Oral) - The petitioner is seeking grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.PC in case FIR No.681 dated 07.11.2020 under Sections 341, 342, 376(2)(n), 376(2)(f), 376-D IPC registered at Police Station City Karnal, District Karnal.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that on 03.10.2020, the prosecutrix went missing from her house, as a result of which, FIR No.281 dated 04.10.2020 under Section 346 IPC at Police Station Sadar Safidon was lodged by her mother. At the time of registration of aforementioned FIR, the mother of the prosecutrix did not raise any suspicion qua the involvement of any person much less the petitioner. She further submits that after her recovery on 04.11.2020, prosecutrix got her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.PC wherein she stated that she had gone to Shimla of her own accord and stayed there for 15 days in the house of a friend. Thereafter, she had gone and stayed in the house of one Akritiat Karnal for one week and thereafter, she met the police in Karnal and expressed her desire to return home. Learned counsel contends that in her first statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.PC, the prosecutrix

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top