SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1178

ARCHANA PURI
Hakam Singh (now Deceased) Through Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Amarjodh Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.K.B.Raheja, Advocate for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Archana Puri, J. - The matter has been taken up through video conferencing in the light of COVID-19 pandemic.

CM-869-CII-2022

2. The present application has been filed for placing on record application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC and reply, as Annexure P-4 and P-5.

3. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed, subject to just exceptions. Annexures P-4 and P-5 are taken on record.

CR-1275-2020

4. The present revision petition has been filed by the LRs of Hakam Singh namely Gurpreet Singh and Jaskaran Singh, to assail the order dated 09.12.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), whereby, the application filed by the petitioners for seeking amendment of the written statement, has been dismissed.

5. During the pendency of the suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 14.06.2016 filed by Amarjodh Singh against Hakam Singh, an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, for amendment of the written statement, was filed by the present petitioners, who were impleaded as legal heirs of Hakam Singh-defendant.

6. The plaintiff had filed the suit for possession by way of specific performance of the agreement to se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top