SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1183

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Tanisha Madan – Appellant
Versus
Nipun Madan – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Mansi Mridula, Advocate for Appellant No.1; Mr. Dhruva Bhagat, Advocate for Appellant No.2.

JUDGMENT

Raj Mohan Singh, J.(Oral) - This is a joint petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 CPC for setting aside the order dated 21.10.2021 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Gurugram in HMA No.913 of 2021 titled Nipun Madan and Tanisha Madan.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner No.1 submits that though the application filed by the parties to waive off the statutory Cooling off period of six months under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage has been dismissed, but the said period has

3. now been satisfied and is almost over. Parties are aggrieved of the impugned order to the extent of calling upon any family member or relative or someone from the circle of petitioner No.1 at the time of statement of the parties in second motion.

4. Learned counsel further contends that first motion was recorded on 06.08.2021 and presence of mother of petitioner No.1 was compelled and the same was recorded in the joint statement made by the parties. Under the law, there is no such requirement as the parties are educated and competent and are not undergoing any disability in law so as to impede the process in any manner. Both the parties are bei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top