SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1141

SUKHVINDER KAUR
Arjun Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Shristi Vashishtha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. G.S. Gopera, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Toni, Advocate for petitioner No.1.
Ms. Ekta Sharma, Advocate for petitioner No.2.

JUDGMENT

Sukhvinder Kaur, J.

The instant revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 09.04.2024 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, whereby the application filed by the petitioners for waiver of the statutory period of six months for recording of statements in second motion was declined.

2. The relevant facts for adjudication of the present lis are that marriage of petitioner No.1 with petitioner No.2 was solemnized on 22.02.2023 as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. No child was born out of such wedlock. The parties lived together as husband and wife only for 6 days. The parents and other respectables tried to resolve the dispute between the parties, but the parties could not resolve their differences. So they agreed to dissolve their marriage with mutual consent and filed petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act within one year of their marriage, which was allowed to be filed vide order dated 18.01.2024 by allowing their application filed under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The statements of the parties in the first motion were recorded before the Additional Distr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top