SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1220

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Prem Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Moudgil, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Rajbir Sehrawat, J. (Oral) - This is third petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.274 dated 06.11.2020, registered under Sections 323, 325, 341, 380, 427, 506, 148, 149 IPC and Section 307 IPC (added later on by replacing Section 308 IPC), at Police Station Krishna Gate, Thanesar, Kurukshetra (Haryana).

2. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that in the same gamut of facts involving the same allegations, the petitioner was already granted anticipatory bail by this Court. However, now the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC has been added by changing the offence punishable under Section 308 of IPC. However, the petitioner is not required for any specific purposes of investigation.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Additional Advocate, General, Haryarna accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and Mr. Akash Mehta, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the complainant.

5. It is submitted by learned State counsel being instructed by SI Ramchandra and being assisted by the counsel for the complainant that the offence punishable under Section 307 has been added on the basis of medic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top