SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1283

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sant Parkash, J.
Hitesh Bhardwaj - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-43601 of 2021 (O & M)
Decided On : 07-01-2022

Advocates:
Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate and Mr. Ashutosh, Advocate,, for the Appellant; Mr. Tanvir Joshi, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate, for respondent No.2 - CBI. Mr. Preetinder Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate, for respondent No.3, for the Respondent

The court emphasized that the power to transfer investigation to a specialized agency should be exercised sparingly and in exceptional circumstances, and in this case, the local police was deemed capable of handling the investigation.

Headnote:

Criminal Conspiracy - Transfer of Investigation - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - [MURDER] - [Section 302, 120-B IPC] - The court discussed the sequence of events leading to the suspicion of murder by the respondent, the investigation conducted by the local police, the cancellation report, and the subsequent reinvestigation. The court found that the case did not warrant transfer of investigation to a specialized agency like CBI, as it primarily involved local issues and the State police was equipped to handle such cases.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought transfer of investigation of a murder case involving his mother's death, suspecting his brother, respondent No.3, of conspiring to murder her to usurp the family property. The local police's investigation, cancellation report, and subsequent reinvestigation were challenged by the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the case did not warrant transfer of investigation to a specialized agency like CBI, as it primarily involved local issues and the State police was well equipped to handle such cases.

Issues: The main issue was whether the investigation of the murder case should be transferred to a specialized agency like CBI due to suspicions of local police bias and the involvement of family property disputes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the case did not warrant transfer of investigation to a specialized agency like CBI, as it primarily involved local issues and the State police was well equipped to handle such cases.

Final Decision: The petition seeking transfer of investigation to a specialized agency like CBI was dismissed by the court.

JUDGMENT

Sant Parkash, J. - CRM-43483-2021

1. Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for placing on record short reply by way of affidavit of Nitesh Bhardwaj - respondent No.3 is allowed.

2. Reply taken on record.

CRM-M-43601 of 2021

3. Through the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking transfer of investigation of case FIR No.354 dated 30.10.2020 (Annexure P-24) under Sections 302, 120-B IPC registered with Police Station, Civil Lines, Batala to Central Bureau of Investigation or any other independent agency outside the jurisdiction of the State of Punjab.

4. The petitioner is the complainant of present FIR. Earlier FIR No.121 dated 26.04.2013 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 302/34 IPC was registered with Police Station, Vasant Kunj (South), Delhi, in relation to the murder of Deepak Bhardwaj, father of petitioner herein. During investigation, police authorities arrested petitioner's brother Nitesh Bhardwaj (respondent No.3). Though, he was acquitted by the trial court as the sole eye witness of the occurrence died in a road accident in Ludhiana before he could testify in the trial. The judgment of acquittal of respondent No.3 was challenged by the petitioner as well as the State by filing two separate appeals.

5. On 14.07.2014, petitioner's mother - Ramesh Kumari Bhardwaj, executed a registered Will bequeathing all her property in favour of respondent No.3. After acquittal, respondent No.3 made demand of being appointed as a Director in all the family companies. The petitioner's mother appointed him as such. On 22.02.2020, petitioner's mother executed another hand written Will being her last Will in which respondent No.3 would no longer inherit all the property rather it was to be divided in equal shares between both the brothers i.e. petitioner - Hitesh Bhardwaj and respondent No.3 - Mr.Nitesh Bhardwaj. When the Petitioner's mother disclosed the factum of execution of Will dated 22.02.2020 to Nitesh Bhardwaj, he got annoyed and started quarrelling and threatening.

6. On 07.03.2020, Nitesh Bhardwaj alongwith his wife - Nistha Bhardwaj and his brother in law conspired against his mother and persuaded her to go to Batala with them to Nistha's parental house, whereupon she sensing the foul play, insisted that Sandeep, her nehew, and one Balbir Singh should accompany her to Batala. Nitesh Bhardwaj and his wife insisted petitioner's mother to sleep with them in the main portion of the house. On 08.03.2020, Balbir Singh was informed that petitioner's mother has suffered a heart attack and passed away whereafter her post- mortem was got conducted without even informing the petitioner. The post- mortem report was given by an ortho specialist (who was not even competent to conduct a post-mortem) stating that the victim suffered a cardiac arrest which lead to her death without there being any history of heart ailment. Petitioner has alleged that respondent No.3 - Nitesh Bhardwaj, not only murdered his own mother but also his father with a malafide intention to usurp the entire property.

7. Petitioner doubted that his mother had died under suspicious and mysterious circumstances which call for a fair and proper investigation.

8. So, he filed a detailed complaint at Police Station, Civil Lines, Batala in relation to commission of offence of criminal conspiracy to murder.

9. However, no proper and fair investigation took place pursuant to his complaint. Be that as it may, after two months, formal FIR was registered and statements of persons concerned were recorded under Section 160 Cr.P.C. which were contradictory in nature and created a suspicion upon the act and conduct of respondent No.3 but still no action was taken by the local police against the culprits.

10. Aggrieved by the inaction of Batala police, on 17.06.2020, petitioner filed a petition before this Court viz. CRM-M-16384 of 2020 seeking a fair and impartial investigation, wherein this Court vide judgment dated 25.06.2020 gave directions to Superintendent of Police, Batala, to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top