SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1294

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sant Parkash, J.
Balwinder Pal Alias Kala - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Revision No. 1121 of 2021 (O&M)
Decided On : 06-01-2022

Advocates:
Rajesh Kumar Dhankhar, Advocate, Tanvir Joshi, Advocate, Pardeep Solath, Advocate

The court can allow the compounding of the offence under the N.I. Act based on a compromise between the parties, leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Headnote:

Compounding of Offence - Negotiable Instruments Act - The court allowed the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act based on the compromise between the accused and the complainant, leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a revision petition seeking to set aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the lower court. The substantive sentence of imprisonment was suspended due to a compromise between the parties.

Finding of the Court:

The court accepted the compromise between the accused and the complainant, leading to the acquittal of the accused and setting aside of the previous judgments.

Issues: The main issue was the compounding of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act based on the compromise between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 320 of the Cr.P.C. and the interpretation provided by the Supreme Court in JIK INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND OTHERS VS. AMARLAL V. JUMANI AND ANOTHER to allow the compounding of the offence under the N.I. Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the revision petition, acquitted the petitioner-accused of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, and set aside the previous judgments. The application for suspension of sentence was disposed of as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

Sant Parkash, J. - The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

CRR-1121-2021

2. The petitioner has filed present revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. for setting aside judgment dated 09.09.2021 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Pathankot dismissing appeal against judgment of conviction and order of sentence both dated 19.10.2019 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pathankot.

3. Vide order dated 13.12.2021, the substantive sentence of imprisonment as imposed upon the petitioner was suspended till today on the ground that the parties have entered into compromise.

4. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.2-complainant has admitted the factum of compromise and has further submitted that respondent No. 2/complainant has received the entire cheque amount from the petitioner-accused and has no objection in case the petitioner-accused is acquitted of the offence.

Offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act is compoundable under Section 147 of the N.I. Act.

5. In JIK INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND OTHERS VS. AMARLAL V. JUMANI AND ANOTHER : 2012(1) R.C.R.(CRIMINAL) 822 it was held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that the basic procedure of compounding an offence laid down in Section 320 of the Cr.P.C. will apply to compounding of an offence under the N.I. Act.

6. Section 320(6) of the Cr.P.C. empowers the High Court acting in exercise of its powers of revision under section 401 to allow any person to compound any offence which such person is competent to compound under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C.

7. The petitioner-accused and respondent No.2-complainant have compromised and settled the dispute between them. Respondent No.2-complainant has already received the amount of the cheque from the petitioner-accused. Compromise will restore cordial relations between the parties and will also contribute to peace and harmony in the society. Therefore, the offence under the N.I. Act is compounded.

8. In view of the facts and circumstances, the compromise deed entered into between the parties is accepted and in view of the compromise, the petitioner-accused is acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act in terms of the compromise deed and judgment dated 09.09.2021 passed in appeal by learned Sessions Judge, Pathankot and judgment of conviction and order of sentence both dated 19.10.2019 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pathankot are set aside.

The revision petition is allowed accordingly and the petitioner is ordered to be set at liberty in this case.

CRM-32722-2021

9. In view of the composition of the offence and consequent acquittal of the petitioner, the present application for suspension of sentence has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the present application is disposed of as having become infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top