Back
2023 Supreme(P&H) 86
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anoop Chitkara, J.
Kirpal Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 21009 of 2021
Decided On : 17-01-2023
Important Points
Subject
Criminal Law - Bail and Pretrial Release
Headnote
Interim Bail - Compliance with Conditions - The petitioner was granted interim bail and upon compliance with the conditions, the interim order was made absolute.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was granted interim bail and claimed compliance with all conditions.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had complied with all the conditions of the interim bail and made the interim order absolute.
Issues: Allegations for recovery of drug money and heroin against the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Compliance with the conditions of the interim bail led to the making of the interim order absolute.
Final Decision: The present petition was allowed and the interim order dated 03.11.2022 was made absolute.
Chandan Singh, Advocate, Virat Rana, Advocate
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The allegations against the petitioner are for recovery of Rs. 2 lakhs claiming it to be drug money and 30 grams of heroin.
2. Vide order dated 03.11.2022, this Court had granted interim bail to the petitioner.
3. Counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner has complied with all the conditions and he undertakes to continue complying with the conditions of order dated 03.11.2022 to which he has no objection.
4. Given the categorical statement of petitioner about the compliance of the conditions, the present petition is allowed and interim order dated 03.11.2022 is made absolute.
5. All pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
