SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 86

ANOOP CHITKARA
Kirpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandan Singh, Advocate, Virat Rana, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. - The allegations against the petitioner are for recovery of Rs. 2 lakhs claiming it to be drug money and 30 grams of heroin.

2. Vide order dated 03.11.2022, this Court had granted interim bail to the petitioner.

3. Counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner has complied with all the conditions and he undertakes to continue complying with the conditions of order dated 03.11.2022 to which he has no objection.

4. Given the categorical statement of petitioner about the compliance of the conditions, the present petition is allowed and interim order dated 03.11.2022 is made absolute.

5. All pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top