IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Avneesh Jhingan, J.
Deepak Singh @ Deepu - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 34256 of 2022
Decided On : 13-12-2022
Regular Bail - Parity with Co-accused - The court granted regular bail to the petitioners based on the parity with co-accused and considering the circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition seeking regular bail in a case involving charges under Sections 399/402 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner claimed parity with co-accused who were granted bail in connected cases.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted bail to the petitioner without commenting on the merits of the case, based on the parity with co-accused and considering the circumstances of the case.
Issues: The main issue was the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving serious charges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court granted bail to the petitioner based on the parity with co-accused and without commenting on the merits of the case.
Final Decision: The petition seeking regular bail was allowed, and the petitioner was directed to be released on regular bail upon furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.
JUDGMENT
Avneesh Jhingan, J. - This petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is filed seeking regular bail in FIR No. 315 dated 27.12.2021, under Sections 399/402 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Chhehratta, District Amritsar.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner claims parity with co- accused who were granted bail by this court on 16.5.2022 in CRM-M- 11000 of 2022 and connected cases.
3. On 16.5.2022, this court passed the following order:
'Prayer in both these petitions is for grant of regular bail to petitioners Sukhsahibjit Singh @ Sahib, Malkiat Singh @ Billa and Lovepreet Singh, in FIR No.315 dated 27.12.2021 under Sections 399 & 402 IPC and Sections 25 & 27 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Chheharta, District Amritsar.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that as per allegations in the FIR, registered at the instance of ASI Jagjit Singh, while on patrol duty, he received a secret information that Amanpreet Singh @ Anda, Ajay, Lovepreet Singh @ Love, Deepak Singh @ Deepu, Rahul, Sarabjit Singh @ Sarab, Malkiat Singh @ Billa and Sukhsahib Singh are present with deadly weapons and are preparing to commit the offence of dacoity. Thereafter, the police party apprehended them and effected the recovery of some weapons. It is further submitted that from petitioner Sukhsahibjit Singh @ Sahib, a kirpan was recovered and from petitioner Malkiat Singh @ Billa, a baseball bat was recovered. It is also submitted that the petitioners are first offenders; they are in custody for the last 04 months and 14 days and are not involved in any other case.
Learned State counsel, on the basis of custody certificates filed in the Court today, could not dispute the factual position.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without commenting anything on merits of the case and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, these three petitions are allowed and petitioners Sukhsahibjit Singh @ Sahib, Malkiat Singh @ Billa and Lovepreet Singh are directed to be released on regular bail subject to furnishing their bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, concerned.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases.'
4. Learned counsel for the State, appearing on advance notice though opposes the prayer for grant of bail, he is not able to distinguish the parity of the petitioner with the co-accused so far as grant of bail is concerned. He further submits that knife was recovered from the petitioner.
5. Without commenting on the merits of the case and on the basis of parity of the petitioner with the co-accused so far as grant of bail is concerned, the petitioner is granted bail subject to furnishing his bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court/Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.
The petition is allowed.
6. Since the main petition has been disposed of, the pending application if any is rendered infructuous.
The court may grant regular bail based on the parity with co-accused and considering the circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the nature of the recovery attributed to the petitioner, the criminal antecedents, and the application of the law laid down in....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of criminal antecedents, completion of investigation, and the enlargement of other accused on bail can be considered as grounds to....
The recovery of illegal weapons, bullets, and non-commercial quantity of intoxicant powder, as well as the petitioner's involvement in 19 more cases, were key factors in denying bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the length of custody, lack of evidence of the petitioner being a habitual offender, contradictions in the complainant's state....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.